These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

458 related items for PubMed ID: 18643810

  • 1. Innovative peer review model for rural physicians: system design and implementation.
    Williams JR, Mechler K, Akins RB.
    J Rural Health; 2008; 24(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 18643810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Assurance of process-quality in pulmonary practice by means of a peer-review system--a pilot project].
    Fischer J, Köhler D, Magnussen H.
    Pneumologie; 2006 Aug; 60(8):485-92. PubMed ID: 16933192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The changing nature of nursing work in rural and small community hospitals.
    Montour A, Baumann A, Blythe J, Hunsberger M.
    Rural Remote Health; 2009 Aug; 9(1):1089. PubMed ID: 19199373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effectiveness of an enhanced peer assessment program: introducing education into regulatory assessment.
    Wenghofer EF, Way D, Moxam RS, Wu H, Faulkner D, Klass DJ.
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2006 Aug; 26(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 16986145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Obstetric care and cesarean birth rates: a program to monitor quality of care.
    Dillon WP, Choate JW, Nusbaum ML, McCarthy MA, McCall M, Rosen MG.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Nov; 80(5):731-7. PubMed ID: 1407907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A hospital-randomized controlled trial of an educational quality improvement intervention in rural and small community hospitals in Texas following implementation of information technology.
    Filardo G, Nicewander D, Hamilton C, Herrin J, Galimbretti P, Tietze M, McBride S, Gunderson J, Haydar Z, Williams J, Ballard DJ.
    Am J Med Qual; 2007 Nov; 22(6):418-27. PubMed ID: 18006422
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE, Kleijnen J.
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. An innovative approach to peer review for the advanced practice nurse--a focus on critical incidents.
    Kenny KJ, Baker L, Lanzon M, Stevens LR, Yancy M.
    J Am Acad Nurse Pract; 2008 Jul; 20(7):376-81. PubMed ID: 18638177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. National Data Bank to revolutionize peer review reporting.
    Lockhart L, Poe K, Wilcox DP.
    Natl Med Leg J; 1990 Jul; 1(2):1, 8-9. PubMed ID: 2088551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases.
    Leiker M.
    WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the physician achievement review.
    Hall W, Violato C, Lewkonia R, Lockyer J, Fidler H, Toews J, Jennett P, Donoff M, Moores D.
    CMAJ; 1999 Jul 13; 161(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 10420867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A perception of the rural health situation in central Texas: we need regionalization.
    Bernstein R, Webb CR.
    Tex Med; 1991 Apr 13; 87(4):91-3. PubMed ID: 2035164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of an interpractice visit peer review program for rural Australian general practice registrars.
    Fraser J.
    Aust Fam Physician; 2006 Mar 13; 35(3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16525528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.
    McAuley RG, Henderson HW.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1984 Sep 15; 131(6):557-61. PubMed ID: 6478338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Peer review: a method for the analysis of the quality of processing in-patient rehabilitation methods].
    Jäckel WH, Maier-Riehle B, Protz W, Gerdes N.
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 1997 Nov 15; 36(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 9490459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Challenges in conducting a hospital-randomized trial of an educational quality improvement intervention in rural and small community hospitals.
    Filardo G, Nicewander D, Herrin J, Galimbertti P, Tietze M, McBride S, Gunderson J, Collinsworth A, Haydar Z, Williams J, Ballard DJ.
    Am J Med Qual; 2008 Nov 15; 23(6):440-7. PubMed ID: 18984908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Key issues and barriers to obstetrical anesthesia care in Ontario community hospitals with fewer than 2,000 deliveries annually.
    Angle P, Kurtz Landy C, Murthy Y, Cino P.
    Can J Anaesth; 2009 Sep 15; 56(9):667-77. PubMed ID: 19533265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. MMA peer review program to monitor quality of care.
    Hanson PC.
    Minn Med; 1993 Apr 15; 76(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 8515734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. New peer review reporting and disclosure requirements--Part I.
    Lockhart L, Poe K, Wilcox DP.
    Tex Med; 1990 Feb 15; 86(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 2309165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.