These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

645 related items for PubMed ID: 18646839

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. SLICK--scoring and energy functions for protein-carbohydrate interactions.
    Kerzmann A, Neumann D, Kohlbacher O.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1635-42. PubMed ID: 16859295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV, Novikov FN, Stroylov VS, Kulkov V, Chilov GG.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F, Amadasi A, Fornabaio M, Abraham DJ, Mozzarelli A, Kellogg GE, Cozzini P.
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking.
    Yang JM, Chen CC.
    Proteins; 2004 May 01; 55(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 15048822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Protein-ligand docking using mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLSDOCK).
    Viji SN, Prasad PA, Gautham N.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec 01; 49(12):2687-94. PubMed ID: 19968302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking.
    Pei J, Wang Q, Liu Z, Li Q, Yang K, Lai L.
    Proteins; 2006 Mar 01; 62(4):934-46. PubMed ID: 16395666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential.
    Liu Z, Dominy BN, Shakhnovich EI.
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jul 14; 126(27):8515-28. PubMed ID: 15238009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Investigation of MM-PBSA rescoring of docking poses.
    Thompson DC, Humblet C, Joseph-McCarthy D.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May 14; 48(5):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18465849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility.
    Antes I.
    Proteins; 2010 Apr 14; 78(5):1084-104. PubMed ID: 20017216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Binding response: a descriptor for selecting ligand binding site on protein surfaces.
    Zhong S, MacKerell AD.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007 Apr 14; 47(6):2303-15. PubMed ID: 17900106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the performance of four molecular docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
    Li X, Li Y, Cheng T, Liu Z, Wang R.
    J Comput Chem; 2010 Aug 14; 31(11):2109-25. PubMed ID: 20127741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity.
    Baxter CA, Murray CW, Clark DE, Westhead DR, Eldridge MD.
    Proteins; 1998 Nov 15; 33(3):367-82. PubMed ID: 9829696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.