These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 18646977

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements at and around 4 kHz.
    Reuven ML, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Rasetshwane DM, Allen JB, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(6):779-88. PubMed ID: 24165303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.
    Maxim T, Shera CA, Charaziak KK, Abdala C.
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1345-1358. PubMed ID: 30882535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements.
    Richmond SA, Kopun JG, Neely ST, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3134-40. PubMed ID: 21568416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of calibration method on distortion-product otoacoustic emission measurements: I. test performance.
    Burke SR, Rogers AR, Neely ST, Kopun JG, Tan H, Gorga MP.
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):533-45. PubMed ID: 20458246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of common stimulus parameters on distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure.
    Johnson TA, Baranowski LG.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Aug; 33(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 21918451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of ear-canal standing waves on measurements of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3200-14. PubMed ID: 8550945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Compensating for ear-canal acoustics when measuring otoacoustic emissions.
    Charaziak KK, Shera CA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):515. PubMed ID: 28147590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA, Reed CM, Robinson SR, Perez ZD.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Jan; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intensimetric detection of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with ear canal calibration.
    Sisto R, Cerini L, Sanjust F, Moleti A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jul; 142(1):EL13. PubMed ID: 28764449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Jul; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Characteristics of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission in a normal hearing population.
    Poling GL, Siegel JH, Lee J, Lee J, Dhar S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):287-99. PubMed ID: 24437769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sound calibration and distortion product otoacoustic emissions at high frequencies.
    Siegel JH, Hirohata ET.
    Hear Res; 1994 Nov; 80(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 7896573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Profiles of Stimulus-Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in Humans.
    Dewey JB, Dhar S.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2017 Feb; 18(1):89-110. PubMed ID: 27681700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. High-Frequency Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Repeatability in a Patient Population.
    Dreisbach L, Zettner E, Chang Liu M, Meuel Fernhoff C, MacPhee I, Boothroyd A.
    Ear Hear; 2018 Feb; 39(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28678077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effects of negative middle ear pressure on distortion product otoacoustic emissions and application of a compensation procedure in humans.
    Sun XM, Shaver MD.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 19194291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.
    Souza NN, Dhar S, Neely ST, Siegel JH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Oct; 136(4):1768-87. PubMed ID: 25324079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Level dependence of the nonlinear-distortion component of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.
    Zelle D, Thiericke JP, Dalhoff E, Gummer AW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3475-90. PubMed ID: 26723305
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.