These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. [Participation in the Dutch national screening programme for uterine cervic cancer higher after invitation by a general practitioner, especially in groups with a traditional low level of attendance]. de Nooijer DP, de Waart FG, van Leeuwen AW, Spijker WW. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Oct 15; 149(42):2339-43. PubMed ID: 16261714 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Marrying research, clinical practice and cervical screening in Australian Aboriginal women in western New South Wales, Australia. Read CM, Bateson DJ. Rural Remote Health; 2009 Oct 15; 9(2):1117. PubMed ID: 19459723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An assessment of rural women's knowledge, constraints and perceptions on cervical cancer screening: the case of two districts in Zimbabwe. Mangoma JF, Chirenje MZ, Chimbari MJ, Chandiwana SK. Afr J Reprod Health; 2006 Apr 15; 10(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 16999199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. State-level differences in breast and cervical cancer screening by disability status: United States, 2008. Armour BS, Thierry JM, Wolf LA. Womens Health Issues; 2009 Apr 15; 19(6):406-14. PubMed ID: 19879454 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Møller H, Hakama M, Parkin DM. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Mar 15; 14(3):677-86. PubMed ID: 15767349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer. Lindqvist PG, Hellsten C, Rippe A. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar 15; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Current techniques in screening for cervical cancer in Spain: updated recommendations. Puig-Tintoré LM, Torné A, Alonso I. Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Sep 15; 110(3 Suppl 2):S8-S10. PubMed ID: 18606440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A quasi-randomized trial on the effectiveness of an invitation letter to improve participation in a setting of opportunistic screening for cervical cancer. de Jonge E, Cloes E, Op de Beeck L, Adriaens B, Lousbergh D, Orye GG, Buntinx F. Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Jun 15; 17(3):238-42. PubMed ID: 18414195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer risk factors and predictors of cervical dysplasia among women in south-west Nigeria. Ogunbowale T, Lawoyin TO. Aust J Rural Health; 2008 Dec 15; 16(6):338-42. PubMed ID: 19032205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening. Spayne J, Ackerman I, Milosevic M, Seidenfeld A, Covens A, Paszat L. Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr 15; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical cancer screening in medically underserved California Latina and non-Latina women: effect of age and regularity of Pap testing. Howell LP, Gurusinghe S, Tabnak F, Sciortino S. Cancer Detect Prev; 2009 Apr 15; 32(5-6):372-9. PubMed ID: 19264426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]