These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

344 related items for PubMed ID: 18663765

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Use of ultrasonography to estimate fetal weight in premature infants. Development of a new mathematical formula].
    Rosati P, Exacoustos C, Liverani A, Pieroni A, Puggioni GF, Caruso A.
    Radiol Med; 1990 Nov; 80(5):653-5. PubMed ID: 2267382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
    Abramowicz JS, Robischon K, Cox C.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Fetal biometry by an inexperienced operator using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound.
    Yang F, Leung KY, Lee YP, Chan HY, Tang MH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 May; 35(5):566-71. PubMed ID: 20183864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Does use of a sex-specific model improve the accuracy of sonographic weight estimation?
    Melamed N, Yogev Y, Ben-Haroush A, Meizner I, Mashiach R, Glezerman M.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 39(5):549-57. PubMed ID: 21837761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Study of accuracy of commonly used fetal parameters for estimation of gestational age.
    Karki DB, Sharmqa UK, Rauniyar RK.
    JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2006 May; 45(162):233-7. PubMed ID: 17189967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.
    Weiner CP, Sabbagha RE, Vaisrub N, Socol ML.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jun; 65(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 3889747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Estimation of fetal weight: reference range at 20-36 weeks' gestation and comparison with actual birth-weight reference range.
    Salomon LJ, Bernard JP, Ville Y.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 17444561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. [Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight].
    Merz E, Lieser H, Schicketanz KH, Härle J.
    Ultraschall Med; 1988 Feb; 9(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 3283926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Ultrasound dating at 12-14 weeks of gestation. A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in in-vitro fertilized pregnancies.
    Sladkevicius P, Saltvedt S, Almström H, Kublickas M, Grunewald C, Valentin L.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Oct; 26(5):504-11. PubMed ID: 16149101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A New Sonographic Weight Estimation Formula for Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetuses.
    Faschingbauer F, Dammer U, Raabe E, Kehl S, Schmid M, Schild RL, Beckmann MW, Mayr A.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Aug; 35(8):1713-24. PubMed ID: 27353069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.