These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

425 related items for PubMed ID: 18664686

  • 1. Broadband auditory stream segregation by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Valentine S, Lentz JJ.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1341-52. PubMed ID: 18664686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW, Plyler PN, Hedrick MS.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of context on auditory stream segregation.
    Snyder JS, Carter OL, Lee SK, Hannon EE, Alain C.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1007-16. PubMed ID: 18665741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.
    Lister JJ, Roberts RA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):482-93. PubMed ID: 15989406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The psychophysics of concurrent sound segregation.
    Carlyon RP.
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1992 Jun 29; 336(1278):347-55. PubMed ID: 1354374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC, Plyler PN, Thelin JW, Hedrick MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug 29; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S, Kollmeier B.
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul 18; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
    Summers V, Cord MT.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug 18; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The psychoacoustics of profound hearing impairment.
    Rosen S, Faulkner A, Smith DA.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Aug 18; 469():16-22. PubMed ID: 2356723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Development of a large-item environmental sound test and the effects of short-term training with spectrally-degraded stimuli.
    Shafiro V.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Oct 18; 29(5):775-90. PubMed ID: 18596641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Santurette S, Dau T.
    Hear Res; 2007 Jan 18; 223(1-2):29-47. PubMed ID: 17107767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.