These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

236 related items for PubMed ID: 18666502

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of cyclic loading on marginal adaptation and bond strength in direct vs. indirect class II MO composite restorations.
    Aggarwal V, Logani A, Jain V, Shah N.
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):587-92. PubMed ID: 18833866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM, Kakaboura AI, Ardu S, Krejci I.
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reattachment of anterior fractured teeth: effect of materials and techniques on impact strength.
    Bruschi-Alonso RC, Alonso RC, Correr GM, Alves MC, Lewgoy HR, Sinhoreti MA, Puppin-Rontani RM, Correr-Sobrinho L.
    Dent Traumatol; 2010 Aug; 26(4):315-22. PubMed ID: 20662884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Compressive strength recovery by composite onlays in primary teeth. Substrate treatment and luting agent effects.
    Borges AF, Correr GM, Sinhoreti MA, Consani S, Sobrinho LC, Rontani RM.
    J Dent; 2006 Aug; 34(7):478-84. PubMed ID: 16427182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S, Erdemir A, Yildirim C.
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Tensile bond strength and flexural modulus of resin cements--influence on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with ceramic inlays.
    Habekost Lde V, Camacho GB, Demarco FF, Powers JM.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Oct; 32(5):488-95. PubMed ID: 17910226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A, Nicholls JI, Phillips KM, Libman WJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Oct; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of cuspal coverage on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations.
    Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC.
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Dec; 24(12):875-80. PubMed ID: 20830883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Assessment of laminate technique using glass ionomer and resin composite for restoration of root filled teeth.
    Taha NA, Palamara JE, Messer HH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):617-23. PubMed ID: 22521705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB, Camacho GB, Pereira-Cenci T, Nonaka T, Barbin EL.
    Gen Dent; 2010 Aug; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.