These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
851 related items for PubMed ID: 18669543
1. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y. J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss. Fan X, Wu LL, Ma ZZ, Xiao GG, Liu F. Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Visual field testing with the new Humphrey Matrix: a comparison between the FDT N-30 and Matrix N-30-F tests. Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Felletti M. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 16704697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups. Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M. J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM. J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison between GDx VCC parameter and achromatic perimetry in glaucoma patients. Iester M, Perdicchi A, De Feo F, Fiesoletti E, Amodeo S, Sanna G, Leonardi A, Calabria G. J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 16865003 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [A comparative analysis of standard automated perimetry and short wavelength automated perimetry in early diagnosis of glaucoma]. Chiseliţă D, Crenguţa MI, Danielescu C, Mihaela NM. Oftalmologia; 2006 Aug; 50(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 16927766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]