These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

118 related items for PubMed ID: 18682627

  • 1. Ensuring accuracy and predictability with double-arch impressions.
    Christensen GJ.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Aug; 139(8):1123-5. PubMed ID: 18682627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ, Owen P, Howes DG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The effects of different storage conditions on polyether and polyvinylsiloxane impressions.
    Purk JH, Willes MG, Tira DE, Eick JD, Hung SH.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Jul; 129(7):1014-21. PubMed ID: 9685767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A, Soderholm KJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011 Jul; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
    Endo T, Finger WJ.
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
    Corso M, Abanomy A, Di Canzio J, Zurakowski D, Morgano SM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ability of various impression materials to produce duplicate dies from successive impressions.
    Morgano SM, Milot P, Ducharme P, Rose L.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Apr; 73(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 7783010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How to take an accurate, stress-free impression.
    Polan MA.
    Dent Today; 2004 Mar; 23(3):80, 82-3. PubMed ID: 15060914
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative study of inter-abutment distance of dies made from full arch dual-arch impression trays with those made from full arch stock trays: an in vitro study.
    Reddy JM, Prashanti E, Kumar GV, Suresh Sajjan MC, Mathew X.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 20(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 20139562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U, Oko A, Adeeb S, El-Rich M, Flores-Mir C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical trial investigating success rates for polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impressions made with full-arch and dual-arch plastic trays.
    Johnson GH, Mancl LA, Schwedhelm ER, Verhoef DR, Lepe X.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 20105676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Universal paradigms for predictable final impressions.
    Vakay RT, Kois JC.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Mar; 26(3):199-200, 202-6; quiz 208-9. PubMed ID: 15813574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A simplified impression technique for dental implants.
    Vogel RE.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Mar; 23(3 Suppl 1):13-6. PubMed ID: 11913312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
    Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Ozan O, Ozcelik TB, Yagiz A.
    J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S.
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG, Vahidi F, Bae KH, Lim BS.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ, Dogan S, Mancl LA, Heindl H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Final impressions: a review of material properties and description of a current technique.
    Perakis N, Belser UC, Magne P.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Apr; 24(2):109-17. PubMed ID: 15119881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
    Dogan S, Schwedhelm ER, Heindl H, Mancl L, Raigrodski AJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.