These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

337 related items for PubMed ID: 18685873

  • 21. [Comparative study on effectiveness of percutaneous endoscopic and Wiltse-approach transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Zhu G, Hao Y, Yu L, Zhang P, Cao S.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jan 15; 36(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 35038802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Treatment of grade I and II degree degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with minimally invasive surgery-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion under Quadrant channel].
    Wen J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Liu L, Liu YL, Liu Y, Wang D, Wang ZP.
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2019 Mar 25; 32(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 30921999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lytic spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers.
    Sears W.
    Spine J; 2005 Mar 25; 5(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 15749616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of three patients.
    Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F, Ikeda Y, Takahashi K.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 01; 34(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 19127150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M, Cyriac M, Haines CM, Gudipally M, O'Brien JR.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan 01; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML, Staartjes VE.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May 01; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA, van Santbrink H.
    Spine J; 2017 Nov 01; 17(11):1712-1721. PubMed ID: 28647584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH, Huang WC, Wu JC, Tu TH, Fay LY, Wu CL, Cheng H.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep 01; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Surgical outcomes after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory screw fixation or cortical bone trajectory screw fixation: A comparative study between the polyetheretherketone cage and the same shape titanium-coated polyetheretherketone cage.
    Sakaura H, Ikegami D, Fujimori T, Sugiura T, Yamada S, Mukai Y.
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Oct 01; 209():106945. PubMed ID: 34555798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW, Zakaria HM, Schultz LR, Basheer A, Buraimoh MA, Chang V.
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan 01; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
    Saela S, Pompliano M, Varghese J, Sinha K, Faloon M, Emami A.
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023 Jan 01; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38380431
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Comparative study of radiographic disc height changes using two different interbody devices for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: open box vs. fenestrated tube interbody cage.
    Matsumura A, Taneichi H, Suda K, Kajino T, Moridaira H, Kaneda K.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov 01; 31(23):E871-6. PubMed ID: 17077723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Indirect decompression via oblique lateral interbody fusion for severe degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study with direct decompression transforaminal/posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Shimizu T, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B, Murata K, Matsuda S.
    Spine J; 2021 Jun 01; 21(6):963-971. PubMed ID: 33540124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
    Harris BM, Hilibrand AS, Savas PE, Pellegrino A, Vaccaro AR, Siegler S, Albert TJ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb 15; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.