These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

259 related items for PubMed ID: 18692122

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quantitative analysis of electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in implanted children with auditory neuropathy/dyssynchrony.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Drake S, Wackym PA.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 18025997
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B, Cao KL, Wang Y, Lu Y.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children.
    Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, Runge-Samuelson CL, Reeder RM, Raulie JC.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 14709998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The relationship between the intraoperative ECAP threshold and postoperative behavioral levels: the difference between postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Morita T, Naito Y, Hirai T, Yamaguchi S, Ito J.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2003 Feb; 260(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 12582781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Value of auditory evoked potentials of the brain stem in patients with a Digisonic cochlear implant].
    Truy E, Gallego S, Chanal JM, Collet L, Berger-Vachon C, Morgon A.
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1997 Jun 12; 114(4):116-24. PubMed ID: 9686020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of cochlear implant use on the electrically evoked middle latency response in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun 12; 204(1-2):78-89. PubMed ID: 15925193
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
    Pasanisi E, Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, Bacciu S.
    Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep 12; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul 12; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Electrophysiological characteristics of EABR and its value assessment of cochlear implant].
    Wang Y, Pan T, Zhou N, Ma F.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jan 12; 27(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 23646423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul 12; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug 12; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct 12; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.