These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
283 related items for PubMed ID: 18692556
1. Free field frequency discrimination abilities of cochlear implant users. Pretorius LL, Hanekom JJ. Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):77-84. PubMed ID: 18692556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. Niewiarowicz M, Stieler O. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005 Oct; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening. Roy AT, Jiradejvong P, Carver C, Limb CJ. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Evaluation of rhythmic and timbral perception by normal-hearing and postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users]. Wang S, Dong RJ, Li J, Zhou Y, Qi BE, Chen XQ, Liu B. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 47(6):493-5. PubMed ID: 22932144 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical assessment of music perception in Korean cochlear implant listeners. Jung KH, Cho YS, Cho JK, Park GY, Kim EY, Hong SH, Chung WH, Won JH, Rubinstein JT. Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Jun; 130(6):716-23. PubMed ID: 19958251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants. Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J. Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]