These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 18698521

  • 1. Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.
    Bentler R, Wu YH, Kettel J, Hurtig R.
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Aug; 47(8):447-60. PubMed ID: 18698521
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of performance on the hearing in noise test using directional microphones and digital noise reduction algorithms.
    Nordrum S, Erler S, Garstecki D, Dhar S.
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Jun; 15(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 16803795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effect of hearing aid signal-processing schemes on acceptable noise levels: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH, Stangl E.
    Ear Hear; 2013 Jun; 34(3):333-41. PubMed ID: 23334355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The design and evaluation of a hearing aid with trainable amplification parameters.
    Zakis JA, Dillon H, McDermott HJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):812-30. PubMed ID: 17982368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise.
    Mueller HG, Weber J, Hornsby BW.
    Trends Amplif; 2006 Jun; 10(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 16959732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN, Tardy B, Hedrick M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Phonological mismatch makes aided speech recognition in noise cognitively taxing.
    Rudner M, Foo C, Rönnberg J, Lunner T.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):879-92. PubMed ID: 17982373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Sound quality measures for speech in noise through a commercial hearing aid implementing digital noise reduction.
    Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2005 May; 16(5):270-7. PubMed ID: 16119254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Field trials using a digital hearing aid with active noise reduction and dual-microphone directionality.
    Boymans M, Dreschler WA.
    Audiology; 2000 May; 39(5):260-8. PubMed ID: 11093610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy on the loudness perception and sound quality].
    Liu H, Zhang H, Chen X, Wu Y, Kong Y, Wang S, Li J.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 24(19):886-9. PubMed ID: 21174750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Using hearing aid adaptive directional microphones to enhance cochlear implant performance.
    Chung K, Zeng FG.
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 19450437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.