These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1093 related items for PubMed ID: 18702589

  • 1. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC, Goebel R, Roelfsema PR.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search.
    Houtkamp R, Roelfsema PR.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Apr; 32(2):423-42. PubMed ID: 16634680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Selective attention supports working memory maintenance by modulating perceptual processing of distractors.
    Sreenivasan KK, Jha AP.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 19(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 17214561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
    Bell R, Dentale S, Buchner A, Mayr S.
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The impact of prefrontal cortex for selective attention in a visual working memory task.
    Schreppel TJ, Pauli P, Ellgring H, Fallgatter AJ, Herrmann MJ.
    Int J Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 118(12):1673-88. PubMed ID: 18937114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Visuo-verbal interactions in working memory: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Peters J, Suchan B, Zhang Y, Daum I.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct; 25(2):406-15. PubMed ID: 16099628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Dividing the mind: the necessary role of the frontal lobes in separating memory from search.
    Soto D, Humphreys GW, Heinke D.
    Neuropsychologia; 2006 Oct; 44(8):1282-9. PubMed ID: 16529778
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C, Di Lollo V, McDonald JJ.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I, Corral MJ, Escera C.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR, Mounts JR, Parks NA, Corballis PM.
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May 20; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Inhibiting change: effects of memory on auditory selective attention.
    Melara RD, Chen S, Wang H.
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Oct 20; 25(2):431-42. PubMed ID: 16157478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multiple levels of stimulus representation in visual working memory.
    Shin E, Fabiani M, Gratton G.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 May 20; 18(5):844-58. PubMed ID: 16768382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Consciousness and cognition may be mediated by multiple independent coherent ensembles.
    John ER, Easton P, Isenhart R.
    Conscious Cogn; 1997 Mar 20; 6(1):3-39; discussion 40-1, 50-5, 65-6. PubMed ID: 9170558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrophysiological evidence for independent consolidation of multiple targets.
    Kihara K, Kawahara J, Takeda Y.
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct 08; 19(15):1493-6. PubMed ID: 18797304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Guidance of visual attention from working memory contents depends on stimulus attributes.
    Zhang B, Zhang JX, Kong L, Huang S, Yue Z, Wang S.
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Dec 17; 486(3):202-6. PubMed ID: 20884328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load.
    Park S, Kim MS, Chun MM.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct 17; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The effects of memory load and stimulus relevance on the EEG during a visual selective memory search task: an ERP and ERD/ERS study.
    Gomarus HK, Althaus M, Wijers AA, Minderaa RB.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Apr 17; 117(4):871-84. PubMed ID: 16442346
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. High-resolution ERP mapping of cortical activation related to implicit object-location memory.
    Murphy JS, Wynne CE, O'Rourke EM, Commins S, Roche RA.
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Dec 17; 82(3):234-45. PubMed ID: 19683556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.