These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

495 related items for PubMed ID: 18702900

  • 1. Nasal airway volume and resistance to airflow.
    Zhang G, Solomon P, Rival R, Fenton RS, Cole P.
    Am J Rhinol; 2008; 22(4):371-5. PubMed ID: 18702900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of weight reduction on rhinometric measurements in overweight patients with obstructive sleep apnea.
    Kemppainen T, Ruoppi P, Seppä J, Sahlman J, Peltonen M, Tukiainen H, Gylling H, Vanninen E, Tuomilehto H.
    Am J Rhinol; 2008; 22(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 18702908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Nasal obstruction and sleep-disordered breathing: a study using acoustic rhinometry.
    Morris LG, Burschtin O, Lebowitz RA, Jacobs JB, Lee KC.
    Am J Rhinol; 2005; 19(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 15794072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The importance of side difference in nasal obstruction and rhinomanometry: a retrospective correlation of symptoms and rhinomanometry in 1000 patients.
    Thulesius HL, Cervin A, Jessen M.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 37(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22136145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Objective measurements differ for perception of left and right nasal obstruction.
    Ng TY, Chen YF, Tsai MH, Huang KH, Tai CJ.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2013 Feb; 40(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 22709573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of perceptional nasal obstruction with rhinomanometric and acoustic rhinometric assessment.
    Naito K, Miyata S, Saito S, Sakurai K, Takeuchi K.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 258(10):505-8. PubMed ID: 11829185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Acoustic rhinometry predicts tolerance of nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a pilot study.
    Morris LG, Setlur J, Burschtin OE, Steward DL, Jacobs JB, Lee KC.
    Am J Rhinol; 2006 Dec; 20(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 16686374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and the sensation of nasal patency: a correlative study.
    Roithmann R, Cole P, Chapnik J, Barreto SM, Szalai JP, Zamel N.
    J Otolaryngol; 1994 Dec; 23(6):454-8. PubMed ID: 7897780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Nasal cavity size, airway resistance, and subjective sensation after surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Magnusson A, Bjerklin K, Nilsson P, Jönsson F, Marcusson A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):641-51. PubMed ID: 22051484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Correlation between rhinometric measurement methods in healthy young adults.
    Numminen J, Ahtinen M, Huhtala H, Laranne J, Rautiainen M.
    Am J Rhinol; 2002 Nov; 16(4):203-8. PubMed ID: 12222945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Re: Correlation between subjective and objective evaluation of the nasal airway. A systematic review of the highest level of evidence.
    Hopkins C, Earnshaw J, Roberts D.
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):337-8. PubMed ID: 20738348
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Significance of acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry in the evaluation of submucous correction of nasal septum and submucous resection of inferior turbinate].
    Zhao W, Sun JW, Wang YL, Guo T.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Feb; 47(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 22455812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Correlation between subjective assessment and objective measurement of nasal obstruction].
    Zhang GH, Fenton RS, Rival R, Solomon P, Cole P, Li Y.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 43(7):484-9. PubMed ID: 18826113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of external nasal strips on nasal geometry and intranasal air-conditioning.
    Lindemann J, Tsakiropoulou E, Keck T, Leiacker R, Vital V, Wiesmiller KM.
    Am J Rhinol; 2008 Jul; 22(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 18954510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of rhinometric measurements methods in intranasal pathology.
    Numminen J, Ahtinen M, Huhtala H, Rautiainen M.
    Rhinology; 2003 Jun; 41(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 12868368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of postural change on nasal airway and autonomic nervous system established by rhinomanometry and heart rate variability analysis.
    Ko JH, Kuo TB, Lee GS.
    Am J Rhinol; 2008 Jun; 22(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 18416973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of optical rhinometry and active anterior rhinomanometry using nasal provocation testing.
    Wüstenberg EG, Zahnert T, Hüttenbrink KB, Hummel T.
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 17438248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does nasal obstruction mean that the nose is obstructed?
    Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg SK.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Aug; 118(8):1476-81. PubMed ID: 18475207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Objective assessment of nasal resistance in patients with nasal disease.
    Suzina AH, Hamzah M, Samsudin AR.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2003 Aug; 117(8):609-13. PubMed ID: 12956914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Nasal patency by rhinomanometry in patients with sensation of nasal obstruction.
    Canakcioglu S, Tahamiler R, Saritzali G, Isildak H, Alimoglu Y.
    Am J Rhinol Allergy; 2009 Aug; 23(3):300-2. PubMed ID: 19490805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.