These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

207 related items for PubMed ID: 18704840

  • 21. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, Kiapour A, Sairyo K, Ivanov A, Ebraheim NA, Patel TCh, Goel VK.
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Stability of lumbar spine after artificial disc replacement].
    Lei GH, Li KH, Liu SL, Lin FY, Li LJ, Song XC.
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 Oct; 31(5):728-31. PubMed ID: 17062940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S, Rivera Y, Wu C, Mehbod AA, Transfeldt EE.
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY, Kang H, Rouleau JP, Hollister SJ, Marca FL.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul 01; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ploumis A, Wu C, Fischer G, Mehbod AA, Wu W, Faundez A, Transfeldt EE.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Apr 01; 21(2):120-5. PubMed ID: 18391717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Biomechanical evaluation of the kinematics of the cadaver lumbar spine following disc replacement with the ProDisc-L prosthesis.
    Demetropoulos CK, Sengupta DK, Knaub MA, Wiater BP, Abjornson C, Truumees E, Herkowitz HN.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jan 01; 35(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 20042953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Biomechanical analysis of lumbar spine after implantation of a disk prosthesis and supplementary spinal fusion for management of complications].
    Birnbaum K, Phoa T, Maus U, Prescher A, Weisskopf M.
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2009 Jan 01; 147(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 19693744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Biomechanical effect of different interspinous devices on lumbar spinal range of motion under preload conditions.
    Hartmann F, Dietz SO, Hely H, Rommens PM, Gercek E.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2011 Jul 01; 131(7):917-26. PubMed ID: 21190031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA, Bradford DS, Bertagnoli R, Hu SS, Lotz JC.
    Spine J; 2006 Jul 01; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Biomechanical properties of synthetic lumbar intervertebral disk implants].
    Zöllner J, Rompe JD, Eysel P.
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2000 Jul 01; 138(5):459-63. PubMed ID: 11084749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. [Influence of disc prosthesis position on segmental motion in the lumbar spine].
    Weisskopf M, Maus U, Ohnsorge JA, Prescher A, Pandorf T, Birnbaum K.
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2010 Aug 01; 148(4):453-8. PubMed ID: 20135599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Bible JE, Biswas D, Miller CP, Whang PG, Grauer JN.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr 01; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement.
    Auerbach JD, Ballester CM, Hammond F, Carine ET, Balderston RA, Elliott DM.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr 01; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
    Wang M, Dalal S, Bagaria VB, McGrady LM, Rao RD.
    Spine J; 2007 Apr 01; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
    Hwang SH, Kayanja M, Milks RA, Benzel EC.
    Spine J; 2007 Apr 01; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.