These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

193 related items for PubMed ID: 18704915

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. A prospective analysis of the cephalic vein cutdown approach for chronic indwelling central venous access in 100 consecutive cancer patients.
    Povoski SP.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2000 Aug; 7(7):496-502. PubMed ID: 10947017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Insertion of prolonged venous access device: a comparison between surgical cutdown and percutaneous techniques.
    Sarzo G, Finco C, Parise P, Savastano S, Vecchiato M, Degregori S, Merigliano S.
    Chir Ital; 2004 Aug; 56(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 15287644
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Implanting totally implantable venous access port via the internal jugular vein guided by ultrasonography is feasible and safe in patients with breast cancer.
    Zhou J, Qian S, He W, Han G, Li H, Luo R.
    World J Surg Oncol; 2014 Dec 08; 12():378. PubMed ID: 25487539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Evaluation of totally implantable central venous access devices with the cephalic vein cut-down approach: Usefulness of preoperative ultrasonography.
    Otsubo R, Hatachi T, Shibata K, Yoshida T, Watanabe H, Oikawa M, Matsumoto M, Yano H, Taniguchi H, Nagayasu T.
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan 08; 113(1):114-9. PubMed ID: 26645575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. A novel alternative placement site and technique for totally implantable vascular access ports in non-human primates.
    Graham ML, Rieke EF, Dunning M, Mutch LA, Craig AM, Zolondek EK, Hering BJ, Schuurman HJ, Bianco RW.
    J Med Primatol; 2009 Jun 08; 38(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 19220683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies.
    Kreis H, Loehberg CR, Lux MP, Ackermann S, Lang W, Beckmann MW, Fasching PA.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2007 Feb 08; 33(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17029869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. A comparison of outcomes and complications of totally implantable access port through the internal jugular vein versus the subclavian vein.
    Nagasawa Y, Shimizu T, Sonoda H, Mekata E, Wakabayashi M, Ohta H, Murata S, Mori T, Naka S, Tani T.
    Int Surg; 2014 Feb 08; 99(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 24670030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. [A totally implantable venous access device. Implantation in general or local anaesthesia? A retrospective cost analysis].
    Schuld J, Richter S, Moussavian MR, Kollmar O, Schilling MK.
    Zentralbl Chir; 2009 Aug 08; 134(4):345-9. PubMed ID: 19688683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. A Prospective, Comparative Evaluation on Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices by External Jugular Vein versus Cephalic Vein Cutdown.
    Iorio O, Gazzanelli S, D'Ermo G, Pezzolla A, Gurrado A, Testini M, De Toma G, Cavallaro G.
    Am Surg; 2018 Jun 01; 84(6):841-843. PubMed ID: 29981612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.