These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT. J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients. Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L. BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence. Jones TD, Koch MO, Lin H, Cheng L. BJU Int; 2005 Dec; 96(9):1253-7. PubMed ID: 16287440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy. Savdie R, Horvath LG, Benito RP, Rasiah KK, Haynes AM, Chatfield M, Stricker PD, Turner JJ, Delprado W, Henshall SM, Sutherland RL, Kench JG. BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reasonable delay of surgical treatment in men with localized prostate cancer--impact on prognosis? Graefen M, Walz J, Chun KH, Schlomm T, Haese A, Huland H. Eur Urol; 2005 Jun; 47(6):756-60. PubMed ID: 15925069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative PSA velocity is an independent prognostic factor for relapse after radical prostatectomy. Patel DA, Presti JC, McNeal JE, Gill H, Brooks JD, King CR. J Clin Oncol; 2005 Sep 01; 23(25):6157-62. PubMed ID: 16135482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factors of positive surgical margin and biochemical recurrence of patients treated with radical prostatectomy: a single-center 10-year report. Li K, Li H, Yang Y, Ian LH, Pun WH, Ho SF. Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Apr 01; 124(7):1001-5. PubMed ID: 21542957 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Site of positive surgical margins influences biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Godoy G, Tareen BU, Lepor H. BJU Int; 2009 Dec 01; 104(11):1610-4. PubMed ID: 19549257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy. Magheli A, Rais-Bahrami S, Humphreys EB, Peck HJ, Trock BJ, Gonzalgo ML. J Urol; 2007 Nov 01; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Smith JA, Chan RC, Chang SS, Herrell SD, Clark PE, Baumgartner R, Cookson MS. J Urol; 2007 Dec 01; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]