These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


232 related items for PubMed ID: 18762911

  • 21. Adjustable suspension versus hybrid fixation in hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Putnis SE, Oshima T, Klasan A, Grasso S, Fritsch BA, Coolican MRJ, Parker DA.
    Knee; 2021 Jan; 28():1-8. PubMed ID: 33278738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. MRI in ACL reconstructive surgery with PDLLA bioabsorbable interference screws: evaluation of degradation and osteointegration processes of bioabsorbable screws.
    Macarini L, Murrone M, Marini S, Mocci A, Ettorre GC.
    Radiol Med; 2004 Jan; 107(1-2):47-57. PubMed ID: 15031696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.
    Mayr R, Smekal V, Koidl C, Coppola C, Eichinger M, Rudisch A, Kranewitter C, Attal R.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Apr; 28(4):1036-1044. PubMed ID: 31372680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Randomized prospective study of ACL reconstruction with interference screw fixation in patellar tendon autografts versus femoral metal plate suspension and tibial post fixation in hamstring tendon autografts: 5-year clinical and radiological follow-up results.
    Harilainen A, Linko E, Sandelin J.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2006 Jun; 14(6):517-28. PubMed ID: 16552549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results.
    Järvelä T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R, Järvelä S, Kannus P, Järvinen M.
    Am J Sports Med; 2008 Feb; 36(2):290-7. PubMed ID: 17940145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. A comparison of the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bioabsorbable versus metal interference screws: a meta-analysis.
    Emond CE, Woelber EB, Kurd SK, Ciccotti MG, Cohen SB.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Mar 16; 93(6):572-80. PubMed ID: 21411708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Graft position in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anteromedial versus transtibial technique.
    Guler O, Mahırogulları M, Mutlu S, Cercı MH, Seker A, Cakmak S.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 Nov 16; 136(11):1571-1580. PubMed ID: 27484876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with hamstring tendon autograft and fresh-frozen allograft: a prospective, randomized controlled study.
    Sun K, Zhang J, Wang Y, Xia C, Zhang C, Yu T, Tian S.
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Jul 16; 39(7):1430-8. PubMed ID: 21441418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws.
    Kaeding C, Farr J, Kavanaugh T, Pedroza A.
    Arthroscopy; 2005 Feb 16; 21(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 15689862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Adjustable-Loop Cortical Suspensory Fixation Results in Greater Tibial Tunnel Widening Compared to Interference Screw Fixation in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
    Lee TJ, Jang KM, Kim TJ, Lee SM, Bae JH.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Sep 01; 58(9):. PubMed ID: 36143870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Incorporation of Hamstring Grafts Within the Tibial Tunnel After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Suspensory Fixation Versus Interference Screws.
    Colombet P, Graveleau N, Jambou S.
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Nov 01; 44(11):2838-2845. PubMed ID: 27474387
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Correlation of graft position, knee laxity and clinical outcome: comparison with native anterior cruciate ligament using magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Saowaprut S, Tanpowpong T, Piyaskulkaew C.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Apr 01; 92(4):510-6. PubMed ID: 19374302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Femoral bioabsorbable cross-pin fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Ahn JH, Park JS, Lee YS, Cho YJ.
    Arthroscopy; 2007 Oct 01; 23(10):1093-9. PubMed ID: 17916475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.