These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

232 related items for PubMed ID: 18767688

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mercury removal from flue gases by novel regenerable magnetic nanocomposite sorbents.
    Dong J, Xu Z, Kuznicki SM.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 May 01; 43(9):3266-71. PubMed ID: 19534145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in simulated coal combustion flue gas.
    Rodríguez-Pérez J, López-Antón MA, Díaz-Somoano M, García R, Martínez-Tarazona MR.
    J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep 15; 260():869-77. PubMed ID: 23876255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The application of regenerable sorbents for mercury capture in gas phase.
    Lopez-Anton MA, Fernández-Miranda N, Martínez-Tarazona MR.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Dec 15; 23(24):24495-24503. PubMed ID: 27604126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measurement of mercury in flue gas based on an aluminum matrix sorbent.
    Wang J, Xu W, Wang X, Wang W.
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2011 Dec 15; 11():2469-79. PubMed ID: 22235178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The thief process for mercury removal from flue gas.
    Granite EJ, Freeman MC, Hargis RA, O'Dowd WJ, Pennline HW.
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Sep 15; 84(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 16959396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Active methods of mercury removal from flue gases.
    Marczak M, Budzyń S, Szczurowski J, Kogut K, Burmistrz P.
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar 15; 26(9):8383-8392. PubMed ID: 29572741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Surface compositions of carbon sorbents exposed to simulated low-rank coal flue gases.
    Olson ES, Crocker CR, Benson SA, Pavlish JH, Holmes MJ.
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jun 15; 55(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 16022412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Mercury removal from MSW incineration flue gas by mineral-based sorbents.
    Rumayor M, Svoboda K, Švehla J, Pohořelý M, Šyc M.
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar 15; 73():265-270. PubMed ID: 29248369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Binary mineral sulfides sorbent with wide temperature range for rapid elemental mercury uptake from coal combustion flue gas.
    Wang S, Yang Z, Zhao J, Li H, Yang J, Song J, Guo X.
    Environ Technol; 2021 Jan 15; 42(1):160-169. PubMed ID: 31928335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants.
    Liu SH, Yan NQ, Liu ZR, Qu Z, Wang HP, Chang SG, Miller C.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb 15; 41(4):1405-12. PubMed ID: 17593749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Cost-Effective Manganese Ore Sorbent for Elemental Mercury Removal from Flue Gas.
    Yang Y, Miao S, Liu J, Wang Z, Yu Y.
    Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Aug 20; 53(16):9957-9965. PubMed ID: 31369246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Mercury removals by existing pollutants control devices of four coal-fired power plants in China.
    Wang J, Wang W, Xu W, Wang X, Zhao S.
    J Environ Sci (China); 2011 Aug 20; 23(11):1839-44. PubMed ID: 22432308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.