These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


408 related items for PubMed ID: 18773155

  • 1. [Rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The role of computational mechanics].
    Giannoglou G, Giannakoulas G, Hatzitolios AI, Rudolf J.
    Herz; 2008 Jul; 33(5):354-61. PubMed ID: 18773155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model.
    Rissland P, Alemu Y, Einav S, Ricotta J, Bluestein D.
    J Biomech Eng; 2009 Mar; 131(3):031001. PubMed ID: 19154060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical determinants of abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
    Vorp DA, Vande Geest JP.
    Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol; 2005 Aug; 25(8):1558-66. PubMed ID: 16055757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A biomechanics-based rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm risk assessment: demonstrative application.
    Vande Geest JP, Di Martino ES, Bohra A, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Nov; 1085():11-21. PubMed ID: 17182918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Advancements in identifying biomechanical determinants for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture.
    Kontopodis N, Metaxa E, Papaharilaou Y, Tavlas E, Tsetis D, Ioannou C.
    Vascular; 2015 Feb; 23(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 24757027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of wall calcifications in patient-specific wall stress analyses of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Speelman L, Bohra A, Bosboom EM, Schurink GW, van de Vosse FN, Makaorun MS, Vorp DA.
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Feb; 129(1):105-9. PubMed ID: 17227104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical properties of ruptured versus electively repaired abdominal aortic aneurysm wall tissue.
    Di Martino ES, Bohra A, Vande Geest JP, Gupta N, Makaroun MS, Vorp DA.
    J Vasc Surg; 2006 Mar; 43(3):570-6; discussion 576. PubMed ID: 16520175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of blood flow and vessel geometry on wall stress and rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Li Z, Kleinstreuer C.
    J Med Eng Technol; 2006 Mar; 30(5):283-97. PubMed ID: 16980283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Computational evaluation of aortic aneurysm rupture risk: what have we learned so far?
    Georgakarakos E, Ioannou CV, Papaharilaou Y, Kostas T, Katsamouris AN.
    J Endovasc Ther; 2011 Apr; 18(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 21521062
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A decoupled fluid structure approach for estimating wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Papaharilaou Y, Ekaterinaris JA, Manousaki E, Katsamouris AN.
    J Biomech; 2007 Apr; 40(2):367-77. PubMed ID: 16500664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Wall stress distribution on three-dimensionally reconstructed models of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Raghavan ML, Vorp DA, Federle MP, Makaroun MS, Webster MW.
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):760-9. PubMed ID: 10753284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mechanical stresses in abdominal aortic aneurysms: influence of diameter, asymmetry, and material anisotropy.
    Rodríguez JF, Ruiz C, Doblaré M, Holzapfel GA.
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Apr; 130(2):021023. PubMed ID: 18412510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of diameter, wall stress, and rupture potential index for abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk prediction.
    Maier A, Gee MW, Reeps C, Pongratz J, Eckstein HH, Wall WA.
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Oct; 38(10):3124-34. PubMed ID: 20480238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A patient-specific computational model of fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Wolters BJ, Rutten MC, Schurink GW, Kose U, de Hart J, van de Vosse FN.
    Med Eng Phys; 2005 Dec; 27(10):871-83. PubMed ID: 16157501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Regional distribution of wall thickness and failure properties of human abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Raghavan ML, Kratzberg J, Castro de Tolosa EM, Hanaoka MM, Walker P, da Silva ES.
    J Biomech; 2006 Dec; 39(16):3010-6. PubMed ID: 16337949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of biomechanical failure criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
    Volokh KY.
    J Biomech; 2010 Jul 20; 43(10):2032-4. PubMed ID: 20381050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Factors promoting rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Van Damme H, Sakalihasan N, Limet R.
    Acta Chir Belg; 2005 Feb 20; 105(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 15790196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analysis and computer program for rupture-risk prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Kleinstreuer C, Li Z.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2006 Mar 10; 5():19. PubMed ID: 16529648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.
    Scotti CM, Shkolnik AD, Muluk SC, Finol EA.
    Biomed Eng Online; 2005 Nov 04; 4():64. PubMed ID: 16271141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Intraluminal thrombus and risk of rupture in patient specific abdominal aortic aneurysm - FSI modelling.
    Bluestein D, Dumont K, De Beule M, Ricotta J, Impellizzeri P, Verhegghe B, Verdonck P.
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2009 Feb 04; 12(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 18651282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.