These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
459 related items for PubMed ID: 18774089
1. Mandibular arch form: the relationship between dental and basal anatomy. Ronay V, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Sep; 134(3):430-8. PubMed ID: 18774089 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the mandibular dental and basal arch forms in adults and children with Class I and Class II malocclusions. Gupta D, Miner RM, Arai K, Will LA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):10.e1-8; discussion 10-1. PubMed ID: 20620824 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of dental and apical base arch forms in Class II Division 1 and Class I malocclusions. Ball RL, Miner RM, Will LA, Arai K. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 20620832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relationship between mandibular dental and basal bone arch forms for severe skeletal Class III patients. Zou W, Jiang J, Xu T, Wu J. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jan; 147(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 25533070 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between dental and basal arch forms in skeletal class II malocclusions]. Wu J, Jiang J, Zou W, Xu T, Liu X. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Dec; 31(6):605-9. PubMed ID: 24437297 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of dental and basal arch forms using cone-beam CT and 3D virtual models of normal occlusion. Bayome M, Park JH, Han SH, Baek SH, Sameshima GT, Kook YA. Aust Orthod J; 2013 May; 29(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 23785937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New clinical classification of dental arch form using facial axis points derived from three-dimensional models. Bayome M, Han SH, Choi JH, Kim SH, Baek SH, Kim DJ, Kook YA. Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 22372267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting first molar width using virtual models of dental arches. Lee SP, Delong R, Hodges JS, Hayashi K, Lee JB. Clin Anat; 2008 Jan; 21(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 18092365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A three-dimensional analysis of mandibular arch changes following curve of Spee leveling in nonextraction orthodontic treatment. Chung TS, Sadowsky PL, Wallace DD, McCutcheon MJ. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1997 Jan; 12(2):109-21. PubMed ID: 9511481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional dental measurements: An alternative to plaster models. El-Zanaty HM, El-Beialy AR, Abou El-Ezz AM, Attia KH, El-Bialy AR, Mostafa YA. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):259-65. PubMed ID: 20152684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography. White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Pandis N, Polychronopoulou A, Katsaros C, Eliades T. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Sep; 140(3):e99-e105. PubMed ID: 21889063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Dental and alveolar arch asymmetries in normal occlusion and Class II Division 1 and Class II subdivision malocclusions. Uysal T, Kurt G, Ramoglu SI. World J Orthod; 2009 Sep; 10(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 19388427 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]