These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

986 related items for PubMed ID: 18778350

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.
    Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S, Ospina JC, Mazzoleni F, Errico G, Mastropasqua M, Santoro L, Detti S, de Cobelli O.
    BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 19426191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
    Boris RS, Kaul SA, Sarle RC, Stricker HJ.
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Surgery-related complications in 1253 robot-assisted and 485 open retropubic radical prostatectomies at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden.
    Carlsson S, Nilsson AE, Schumacher MC, Jonsson MN, Volz DS, Steineck G, Wiklund PN.
    Urology; 2010 May; 75(5):1092-7. PubMed ID: 20022085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. How does robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compare with open surgery in men with high-risk prostate cancer?
    Punnen S, Meng MV, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Cowan JE, Carroll PR.
    BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E314-20. PubMed ID: 23451984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
    Kim SC, Song C, Kim W, Kang T, Park J, Jeong IG, Lee S, Cho YM, Ahn H.
    Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open radical prostatectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample.
    Trinh QD, Sammon J, Sun M, Ravi P, Ghani KR, Bianchi M, Jeong W, Shariat SF, Hansen J, Schmitges J, Jeldres C, Rogers CG, Peabody JO, Montorsi F, Menon M, Karakiewicz PI.
    Eur Urol; 2012 Apr; 61(4):679-85. PubMed ID: 22206800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of prostate-specific antigen recurrence-free survival in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing either radical retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
    Schroeck FR, Sun L, Freedland SJ, Albala DM, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ, Moul JW.
    BJU Int; 2008 Jul; 102(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 18384634
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Interval from prostate biopsy to robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: effects on perioperative outcomes.
    Martin GL, Nunez RN, Humphreys MD, Martin AD, Ferrigni RG, Andrews PE, Castle EP.
    BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1734-7. PubMed ID: 19549123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
    Ludovico GM, Dachille G, Pagliarulo G, D'Elia C, Mondaini N, Gacci M, Detti B, Malossini G, Bartoletti R, Cai T.
    Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach.
    Salomon L, Levrel O, Anastasiadis AG, Saint F, de La Taille A, Cicco A, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Chopin D, Abbou CC.
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2002 Jun; 5(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 12627213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. After radical retropubic prostatectomy 'insignificant' prostate cancer has a risk of progression similar to low-risk 'significant' cancer.
    Sengupta S, Blute ML, Bagniewski SM, Inman B, Leibovich BC, Slezak JM, Myers RP, Zincke H.
    BJU Int; 2008 Jan; 101(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 18173824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Risk factors and quality of life for post-prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenoses.
    Wang R, Wood DP, Hollenbeck BK, Li AY, He C, Montie JE, Latini JM.
    Urology; 2012 Feb; 79(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 22196405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years.
    Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, Rahman MB, Rasiah KK, Pe Benito R, Delprado W, Matthews J, Haynes AM, Stricker PD.
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20067454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Does a history of previous surgery or radiation to the prostate affect outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
    Martin AD, Desai PJ, Nunez RN, Martin GL, Andrews PE, Ferrigni RG, Swanson SK, Pacelli A, Castle EP.
    BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1696-8. PubMed ID: 19154449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival.
    Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y, Herrell SD, Chang SS, Clark PE, Davis R, Baumgartner R, Phillips S, Cookson MS, Smith JA.
    J Urol; 2010 Mar; 183(3):990-6. PubMed ID: 20083261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
    Lee D, Choi SK, Park J, Shim M, Kim A, Lee S, Song C, Ahn H.
    Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Differences among patients undergoing perineal or retropubic radical prostatectomy in pain and perioperative variables: a prospective study.
    Paiva CS, Andreoni C, Cunha GP, Khalil W, Ortiz V.
    BJU Int; 2009 Nov; 104(9):1219-26. PubMed ID: 19389007
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 50.