These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
311 related items for PubMed ID: 18780236
1. Field evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler. Macher J, Chen B, Rao C. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):724-34. PubMed ID: 18780236 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Chamber evaluation of a personal, bioaerosol cyclone sampler. Macher J, Chen B, Rao C. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Nov; 5(11):702-12. PubMed ID: 18720289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Airborne viable, non-viable, and allergenic fungi in a rural agricultural area of India: a 2-year study at five outdoor sampling stations. Adhikari A, Sen MM, Gupta-Bhattacharya S, Chanda S. Sci Total Environ; 2004 Jun 29; 326(1-3):123-41. PubMed ID: 15142771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of sampling height on the concentration of airborne fungal spores. Khattab A, Levetin E. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2008 Nov 29; 101(5):529-34. PubMed ID: 19055208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Air-O-Cell, Burkard, and Button Samplers for total enumeration of airborne spores. Aizenberg V, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA, Willeke K. AIHAJ; 2000 Feb 29; 61(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 11192220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Verifying interpretive criteria for bioaerosol data using (bootstrap) Monte Carlo techniques. Spicer RC, Gangloff H. J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Feb 29; 5(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 18075881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioaerosol emissions from a suburban yard waste composting facility. Hryhorczuk D, Curtis L, Scheff P, Chung J, Rizzo M, Lewis C, Keys N, Moomey M. Ann Agric Environ Med; 2001 Feb 29; 8(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 11748875 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring and assessment of airborne fungi in Kolkata, India, by viable and non-viable air sampling methods. Das S, Gupta-Bhattacharya S. Environ Monit Assess; 2012 Aug 29; 184(8):4671-84. PubMed ID: 21915605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fungal spore source strength tester: laboratory evaluation of a new concept. Sivasubramani SK, Niemeier RT, Reponen T, Grinshpun SA. Sci Total Environ; 2004 Aug 15; 329(1-3):75-86. PubMed ID: 15262159 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Main airborne Ascomycota spores: characterization by culture, spore morphology, ribosomal DNA sequences and enzymatic analysis. Oliveira M, Amorim MI, Ferreira E, Delgado L, Abreu I. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2010 Apr 15; 86(4):1171-81. PubMed ID: 20143229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air. Cohen BS, Heikkinen MS, Hazi Y, Gao H, Peters P, Lippmann M. Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep 15; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Collection efficiencies of an electrostatic sampler with superhydrophobic surface for fungal bioaerosols. Han T, Nazarenko Y, Lioy PJ, Mainelis G. Indoor Air; 2011 Apr 15; 21(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 21204982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Annual variation of fungal spores in atmosphere of Porto: 2003. Oliveira M, Ribeiro H, Abreu I. Ann Agric Environ Med; 2005 Apr 15; 12(2):309-15. PubMed ID: 16457491 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Field performance of the CATHIA-T sampler and two cyclones against the standard Cowled sampler for thoracic fiber concentrations. Lee EG, Nelson J, Hintz PJ, Joy G, Andrew ME, Harper M. Ann Occup Hyg; 2010 Jul 15; 54(5):545-56. PubMed ID: 20457784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]