These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
414 related items for PubMed ID: 18789528
1. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review. Meijer EH, Verschuere B, Merckelbach HL, Crombez G. Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment. Kokish R. J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):175-94. PubMed ID: 15308451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy. Kokish R, Levenson JS, Blasingame GD. Sex Abuse; 2005 Apr; 17(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 15974426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex offender polygraph examination: an evidence-based case management tool for social workers. Levenson JS. J Evid Based Soc Work; 2009 Oct; 6(4):361-75. PubMed ID: 20183683 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide. Kingston DA, Yates PM, Firestone P, Babchishin K, Bradford JM. Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy and utility of post-conviction polygraph testing of sex offenders. Grubin D, Madsen L. Br J Psychiatry; 2006 May; 188():479-83. PubMed ID: 16648536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A trial of voluntary polygraphy testing in 10 english probation areas. Grubin D. Sex Abuse; 2010 Sep; 22(3):266-78. PubMed ID: 20713747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Methodological aspects of polygraph testing in the course of judicial proceedings]. Vvedenskiĭ GE, Tkachenko AA, Sekerazh TN. Sud Med Ekspert; 2009 Sep; 52(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 19569540 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Further investigation of findings reported for the Minnesota sex offender screening tool-revised. Langton CM, Barbaree HE, Harkins L, Peacock EJ, Arenovich T. J Interpers Violence; 2008 Oct; 23(10):1363-79. PubMed ID: 18309040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program. Olver ME, Wong SC, Nicholaichuk TP. J Interpers Violence; 2009 Mar; 24(3):522-36. PubMed ID: 18458350 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes in a community sex offender treatment program: a comparison between polygraphed and matched non-polygraphed offenders. McGrath RJ, Cumming GF, Hoke SE, Bonn-Miller MO. Sex Abuse; 2007 Dec; 19(4):381-93. PubMed ID: 17914673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of theory in the assessment of sex offenders. Quackenbush RE. J Child Sex Abus; 2003 Dec; 12(3-4):77-102. PubMed ID: 15308448 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethical practice in sex offender assessment: consideration of actuarial and polygraph methods. Vess J. Sex Abuse; 2011 Sep; 23(3):381-96. PubMed ID: 20944058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Working positively with sexual offenders: maximizing the effectiveness of treatment. Marshall WL, Ward T, Mann RE, Moulden H, Fernandez YM, Serran G, Marshall LE. J Interpers Violence; 2005 Sep; 20(9):1096-114. PubMed ID: 16051729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Forensic psychophysiological expertise with application of polygraph]. Gurgenidze EV, Komissarova IaV. Sud Med Ekspert; 2007 Sep; 50(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 17598443 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of sex offender treatment for psychopathic sexual offenders. Doren DM, Yates PM. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Apr; 52(2):234-45. PubMed ID: 17615428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Mann RE, Hanson RK, Thornton D. Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):191-217. PubMed ID: 20363981 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders. Firestone P, Nunes KL, Moulden H, Broom I, Bradford JM. Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15971010 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes. Rettenberger M, Matthes A, Boer DP, Eher R. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Criminal recidivism among sexual offenders]. Bengtson S, Lund J. Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 Dec 01; 170(49):4035-9. PubMed ID: 19087745 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]