These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

407 related items for PubMed ID: 18805273

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Mitroflow pericardial valve prosthesis in the aortic position: an analysis of long-term outcome and prognostic factors.
    Minami K, Boethig D, Mirow N, Kleikamp G, Koertke H, Godehardt E, Koerfer R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jan; 9(1):112-22. PubMed ID: 10678383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. CarboMedics Mitroflow pericardial aortic bioprosthesis - performance in patients aged 60 years and older after 15 years.
    Benhameid O, Jamieson WR, Castella M, Carrier M, Pomar JL, Germann E, Pellerin M, Brownlee RT.
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 56(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 18481236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Long-term outcome of the MitroFlow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement.
    Sjögren J, Gudbjartsson T, Thulin LI.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Mar; 15(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 16607900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.
    Jamieson WR, Pelletier LC, Gerein AN, Pomar J.
    Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The last generation of pericardial valves in the aortic position: ten-year follow-up in 589 patients.
    Aupart MR, Sirinelli AL, Diemont FF, Meurisse YA, Dreyfus XB, Marchand MA.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Feb; 61(2):615-20. PubMed ID: 8572776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis.
    García-Bengochea J, Sierra J, González-Juanatey JR, Rubio J, Vega M, Fernández AL, Sánchez D.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 May; 15(3):446-51; discussion 451-2. PubMed ID: 16784087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis for aortic calcified stenosis: 18-year experience with 1133 patients.
    Aupart MR, Mirza A, Meurisse YA, Sirinelli AL, Neville PH, Marchand MA.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Nov; 15(6):768-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 17152784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Decision-making in the choice of heart valve for replacement in patients aged 60-70 years: twenty-year follow up of the St. Jude Medical aortic valve prosthesis.
    Emery RW, Arom KV, Kshettry VR, Kroshus TJ, Von R, Kersten TE, Lillehei TJ, Nicoloff DM, Erickson CA.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S37-44. PubMed ID: 11843519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
    Bottio T, Rizzoli G, Caprili L, Testolin L, Thiene G, Gerosa G.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.