These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

357 related items for PubMed ID: 18806689

  • 1. Attention-related modulation of auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure.
    Ikeda K, Sekiguchi T, Hayashi A.
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct 29; 19(16):1593-9. PubMed ID: 18806689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Concentrated pitch discrimination modulates auditory brainstem responses during contralateral noise exposure.
    Ikeda K, Sekiguchi T, Hayashi A.
    Neuroreport; 2010 Mar 31; 21(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 20134353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of contralateral noise on 40-Hz and 80-Hz auditory steady-state responses.
    Maki A, Kawase T, Kobayashi T.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct 31; 30(5):584-9. PubMed ID: 19550336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Effect of ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural roaring noise on brain stem potentials in the guinea pig].
    Dum N, von Wedel H.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Dec 31; 63(12):636-9. PubMed ID: 6521594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Diagnosis of auditory threshold with frequency-specific recording of auditory evoked potentials: personal results and methodological aspects].
    Schönweiler R, Ptok M.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Sep 31; 74(9):531-8. PubMed ID: 7495433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L, Simon G, Joliot M, Andersson F, Bertin T, Zago L, Mellet E, Tzourio-Mazoyer N.
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007 Sep 31; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T, Kawase T, Nakasato N, Kanno A, Ogura M, Tominaga T, Kobayashi T.
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr 15; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Attention effects at auditory periphery derived from human scalp potentials: displacement measure of potentials.
    Ikeda K, Hayashi A, Sekiguchi T, Era S.
    Int J Neurosci; 2006 Oct 15; 116(10):1187-205. PubMed ID: 16923687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Interference in dichotic listening: the effect of contralateral noise on oscillatory brain networks.
    Ross B, Miyazaki T, Fujioka T.
    Eur J Neurosci; 2012 Jan 15; 35(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 22171970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of amplitude modulation of background noise on auditory-evoked magnetic fields.
    Hiraumi H, Nagamine T, Morita T, Naito Y, Fukuyama H, Ito J.
    Brain Res; 2008 Nov 06; 1239():191-7. PubMed ID: 18778694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contralateral white noise attenuates 40-Hz auditory steady-state fields but not N100m in auditory evoked fields.
    Kawase T, Maki A, Kanno A, Nakasato N, Sato M, Kobayashi T.
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jan 16; 59(2):1037-42. PubMed ID: 21945467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Lateral asymmetry in the ABR of neonates: evidence and mechanisms.
    Sininger YS, Cone-Wesson B.
    Hear Res; 2006 Feb 16; 212(1-2):203-11. PubMed ID: 16439078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Musical expertise affects attention as reflected by auditory-evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG.
    Ott CG, Stier C, Herrmann CS, Jäncke L.
    Neuroreport; 2013 Jun 19; 24(9):445-50. PubMed ID: 23660630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A, Stelmack RM, Campbell KB.
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar 17; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Frequency specificity of acoustic evoked potentials of early and intermediate latency with high-pass noise masking].
    Anft D, Bartsch E, Scholz G, Mrowinski D.
    HNO; 1998 May 17; 46(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 9647923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spatial dissociation of changes of level and signal-to-noise ratio in auditory cortex for tones in noise.
    Ernst SM, Verhey JL, Uppenkamp S.
    Neuroimage; 2008 Nov 01; 43(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 18722535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bottom-up driven involuntary attention modulates auditory signal in noise processing.
    Lagemann L, Okamoto H, Teismann H, Pantev C.
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Dec 30; 11():156. PubMed ID: 21192798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ, Cao KL, Wei CG, Liu YZ.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec 05; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA, Burkard R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr 05; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effective masking levels for bone conduction auditory steady state responses in infants and adults with normal hearing.
    Hansen EE, Small SA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Apr 05; 33(2):257-66. PubMed ID: 21926629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.