These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

456 related items for PubMed ID: 18813933

  • 1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine: comparison of 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo, 2D T2*weighted gradient-recalled echo and 3D T2-weighted variable flip-angle turbo spin echo sequences.
    Meindl T, Wirth S, Weckbach S, Dietrich O, Reiser M, Schoenberg SO.
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Mar; 19(3):713-21. PubMed ID: 18813933
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Three-dimensional isotropic T2-weighted cervical MRI at 3T: comparison with two-dimensional T2-weighted sequences.
    Kwon JW, Yoon YC, Choi SH.
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Feb; 67(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 22142499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
    Lee S, Jee WH, Jung JY, Lee SY, Ryu KS, Ha KY.
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MRI of the cervical spine with 3D gradient echo sequence at 3 T: initial experience.
    Xiao L, Siu CW, Yeung K, Leung A, Yuen MK, Wong YC.
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep; 70(9):926-31. PubMed ID: 26145185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnostic performance of heavily T2-weighted techniques in obstructive hydrocephalus: comparison study of two different 3D heavily T2-weighted and conventional T2-weighted sequences.
    Ucar M, Tokgoz N, Damar C, Alimli AG, Oncu F.
    Jpn J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 25559932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [MRI of the regions of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle using a 3D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence. Comparison with conventional 2D T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences].
    Czerny C, Trattnig S, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Imhof H.
    Rofo; 1997 Oct; 167(4):377-83. PubMed ID: 9417266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Quality comparison between three-dimensional T2-weighted SPACE and two-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin echo magnetic resonance images for the brachytherapy planning evaluation of prostate and periprostatic anatomy.
    Bathala TK, Venkatesan AM, Ma J, Bhosale P, Wei W, Kudchadker RJ, Wang J, Anscher MS, Tang C, Bruno TL, Frank SJ, Szklaruk J.
    Brachytherapy; 2020 Oct; 19(4):484-490. PubMed ID: 32402544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Value of three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging with tissue-specific variable refocusing flip angle for 3-T magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison with conventional two- and three-dimensional T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging.
    Tanaka U, Ueno Y, Morinaga Y, Miyake H, Kyotani K, Ueda Y, Kitajima K, Sofue K, Suenaga Y, Sugimura K, Takahashi S.
    Jpn J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):707-717. PubMed ID: 28983811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.