These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
476 related items for PubMed ID: 18817861
1. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Vermeire K, Nobbe A, Schleich P, Nopp P, Voormolen MH, Van de Heyning PH. Hear Res; 2008 Nov; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch. Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, Krenmayr A, Kals M, Voormolen M, Van de Heyning P, Zierhofer C. Hear Res; 2014 Mar; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing. Boëx C, Baud L, Cosendai G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Pelizzone M. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 7(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 16450213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation. Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A. Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-penetrating round window electrode stimulation for tinnitus therapy followed by cochlear implantation. Wenzel GI, Sarnes P, Warnecke A, Stöver T, Jäger B, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Nov; 272(11):3283-93. PubMed ID: 25480476 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees. Vandali A, Sly D, Cowan R, van Hoesel R. Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation. Klawitter S, Landsberger DM, Büchner A, Nogueira W. Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants. Saoji AA, Koka K, Litvak LM, Finley CC. Ear Hear; 2018 Mar; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigations on the tonotopy for patients with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid. Niewiarowicz M, Stieler O. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2005 Mar; 126(2):75-80. PubMed ID: 16180345 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The cochlear implant electrode-pitch function. Baumann U, Nobbe A. Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):34-42. PubMed ID: 16442249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrophysiological spread of excitation and pitch perception for dual and single electrodes using the Nucleus Freedom cochlear implant. Busby PA, Battmer RD, Pesch J. Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):853-64. PubMed ID: 18633324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Electro-acoustic stimulation. Acoustic and electric pitch comparisons. McDermott H, Sucher C, Simpson A. Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Dec; 14 Suppl 1():2-7. PubMed ID: 19390169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Implications of deep electrode insertion on cochlear implant fitting. Gani M, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Kós MI, Boëx C. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 17216585 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New parallel stimulation strategies revisited: effect of synchronous multi electrode stimulation on rate discrimination in cochlear implant users. Bahmer A, Baumann U. Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):142-9. PubMed ID: 22733121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]