These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


136 related items for PubMed ID: 18825953

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation.
    de la Torre-Ruiz MA, Green CM, Lowndes NF.
    EMBO J; 1998 May 01; 17(9):2687-98. PubMed ID: 9564050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.
    Paulovich AG, Margulies RU, Garvik BM, Hartwell LH.
    Genetics; 1997 Jan 01; 145(1):45-62. PubMed ID: 9017389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.
    Vialard JE, Gilbert CS, Green CM, Lowndes NF.
    EMBO J; 1998 Oct 01; 17(19):5679-88. PubMed ID: 9755168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Role of a complex containing Rad17, Mec3, and Ddc1 in the yeast DNA damage checkpoint pathway.
    Kondo T, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K.
    Mol Cell Biol; 1999 Feb 01; 19(2):1136-43. PubMed ID: 9891048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.
    Gardner R, Putnam CW, Weinert T.
    EMBO J; 1999 Jun 01; 18(11):3173-85. PubMed ID: 10357828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Expanded CAG repeats activate the DNA damage checkpoint pathway.
    Lahiri M, Gustafson TL, Majors ER, Freudenreich CH.
    Mol Cell; 2004 Jul 23; 15(2):287-93. PubMed ID: 15260979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Functional and physical interaction between Rad24 and Rfc5 in the yeast checkpoint pathways.
    Shimomura T, Ando S, Matsumoto K, Sugimoto K.
    Mol Cell Biol; 1998 Sep 23; 18(9):5485-91. PubMed ID: 9710632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Analysis of the tolerance to DNA alkylating damage in MEC1 and RAD53 checkpoint mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Gallego-Sánchez A, Ufano S, Andrés S, Bueno A.
    PLoS One; 2013 Sep 23; 8(11):e81108. PubMed ID: 24260543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A Rad53 independent function of Rad9 becomes crucial for genome maintenance in the absence of the Recq helicase Sgs1.
    Nielsen I, Bentsen IB, Andersen AH, Gasser SM, Bjergbaek L.
    PLoS One; 2013 Sep 23; 8(11):e81015. PubMed ID: 24278365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9.
    Wysocki R, Javaheri A, Allard S, Sha F, Côté J, Kron SJ.
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Oct 23; 25(19):8430-43. PubMed ID: 16166626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Robust G1 checkpoint arrest in budding yeast: dependence on DNA damage signaling and repair.
    Gerald JN, Benjamin JM, Kron SJ.
    J Cell Sci; 2002 Apr 15; 115(Pt 8):1749-57. PubMed ID: 11950891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.