These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

413 related items for PubMed ID: 18827122

  • 1. Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial.
    Wing DA, Misoprostol Vaginal Insert Consortium.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 112(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 18827122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S, Calişkan E, Doğer E, Yücesoy I, Ozeren S, Vural B.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Misoprostol dose selection in a controlled-release vaginal insert for induction of labor in nulliparous women.
    Castañeda CS, Izquierdo Puente JC, Leon Ochoa RA, Plasse TF, Powers BL, Rayburn WF.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Sep; 193(3 Pt 2):1071-5. PubMed ID: 16157114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
    Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Sénat MV, Bretelle F, Paule Bonnal A, Ville Y.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L, Alfirevic Z, Powers BL, Wing DA.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Abruptio placentae associated with misoprostol use in women with preeclampsia.
    Fontenot MT, Lewis DF, Barton CB, Jones EM, Moore JA, Evans AT.
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Sep; 50(9):653-8. PubMed ID: 16363752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Neiger R, Greaves PC.
    Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert in parous women for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Ewert K, Powers B, Robertson S, Alfirevic Z.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 108(5):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17077234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
    Calder AA, Loughney AD, Weir CJ, Barber JW.
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Determining dose and endpoints of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert for a phase III trial.
    Wing DA, Powers BL, Rayburn WF.
    J Reprod Med; 2008 Sep; 53(9):695-6. PubMed ID: 18839824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Cheng SY, Ming H, Lee JC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D, Figueroa R, Kalish RB, Catalano CJ, Maulik D.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Savage K, Lincoln T, Owen J.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
    Tan TC, Yan SY, Chua TM, Biswas A, Chong YS.
    BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
    Triglia MT, Palamara F, Lojacono A, Prefumo F, Frusca T.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A prospective randomized study comparing misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term.
    Zeteroğlu S, Engin-Ustün Y, Ustün Y, Güvercinçi M, Sahin G, Kamaci M.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 May; 19(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16753768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor.
    Mayer RB, Oppelt P, Shebl O, Pömer J, Allerstorfer C, Weiss C.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():89-93. PubMed ID: 26995147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
    Henrich W, Dudenhausen JW, Hanel C, Chen FC.
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.