These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 18842088

  • 1. Retinotopic and non-retinotopic stimulus encoding in binocular rivalry and the involvement of feedback.
    van Boxtel JJ, Alais D, van Ee R.
    J Vis; 2008 May 30; 8(5):17.1-10. PubMed ID: 18842088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Removal of monocular interactions equates rivalry behavior for monocular, binocular, and stimulus rivalries.
    van Boxtel JJ, Knapen T, Erkelens CJ, van Ee R.
    J Vis; 2008 Nov 24; 8(15):13.1-17. PubMed ID: 19146297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Inter-ocular transfer of stimulus cueing in dominance selection at the onset of binocular rivalry.
    Kamphuisen AP, van Wezel RJ, van Ee R.
    Vision Res; 2007 Apr 24; 47(9):1142-4. PubMed ID: 17360017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity.
    Alais D, Melcher D.
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan 24; 47(2):269-79. PubMed ID: 17049579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Exogenous attention and endogenous attention influence initial dominance in binocular rivalry.
    Chong SC, Blake R.
    Vision Res; 2006 May 24; 46(11):1794-803. PubMed ID: 16368126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. V1 activity is reduced during binocular rivalry.
    Lee SH, Blake R.
    J Vis; 2002 May 24; 2(9):618-26. PubMed ID: 12678633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Stimulus flicker alters interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
    Knapen T, Paffen C, Kanai R, van Ee R.
    Vision Res; 2007 Jan 24; 47(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 17083956
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Inattention abolishes binocular rivalry: perceptual evidence.
    Brascamp JW, Blake R.
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct 01; 23(10):1159-67. PubMed ID: 22933458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Right parietal TMS shortens dominance durations in binocular rivalry.
    Carmel D, Walsh V, Lavie N, Rees G.
    Curr Biol; 2010 Sep 28; 20(18):R799-800. PubMed ID: 20869603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Determinants of visual awareness following interruptions during rivalry.
    Pearson J, Clifford CG.
    J Vis; 2004 Mar 19; 4(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 15086309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effects of transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual rivalry.
    Pearson J, Tadin D, Blake R.
    J Vis; 2007 May 15; 7(7):2.1-11. PubMed ID: 17685798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.