These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

847 related items for PubMed ID: 18848113

  • 1. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
    Angelopoulos C, Thomas SL, Hechler S, Parissis N, Hlavacek M.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures.
    Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y, Gotoh K, Kondo S, Ariji E.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jan; 109(1):e25-31. PubMed ID: 20123365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
    Ghaeminia H, Meijer GJ, Soehardi A, Borstlap WA, Mulder J, Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Maal TJ.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preoperative assessment of the mandibular canal in implant surgery: comparison of rotational panoramic radiography (OPG), computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for preoperative assessment in implant surgery.
    Pertl L, Gashi-Cenkoglu B, Reichmann J, Jakse N, Pertl C.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 6(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 23513204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings.
    Tantanapornkul W, Okochi K, Bhakdinaronk A, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19114418
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
    Pires CA, Bissada NF, Becker JJ, Kanawati A, Landers MA.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging.
    Paes da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM, Rice D, Ordinola-Zapata R, Alvares Capelozza AL, Bramante CM, Jaramillo D, Christensen H.
    J Endod; 2014 Jan; 40(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 24331989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Radiographic methods used before removal of mandibular third molars among randomly selected general dental clinics.
    Matzen LH, Petersen LB, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Jan; 45(4):20150226. PubMed ID: 26943178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ishak MH, Zhun OC, Shaari R, Rahman SA, Hasan MN, Alam MK.
    Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cone-beam CT for preoperative implant planning in the posterior mandible: visibility of anatomic landmarks.
    Lofthag-Hansen S, Gröndahl K, Ekestubbe A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 18783419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationship between cancellous bone density and mandibular canal depiction.
    Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Kubota Y, Hayashi M, Ariji E.
    Implant Dent; 2009 Apr; 18(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 19359861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The use of 3 different imaging methods for the localization of the mandibular canal in dental implant planning.
    Peker I, Alkurt MT, Michcioglu T.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Apr; 23(3):463-70. PubMed ID: 18700369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Measurement of anterior loop length for the mandibular canal and diameter of the mandibular incisive canal to avoid nerve damage when installing endosseous implants in the interforaminal region: a second attempt introducing cone beam computed tomography.
    Uchida Y, Noguchi N, Goto M, Yamashita Y, Hanihara T, Takamori H, Sato I, Kawai T, Yosue T.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):744-50. PubMed ID: 19304029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars.
    Tantanapornkul W, Okouchi K, Fujiwara Y, Yamashiro M, Maruoka Y, Ohbayashi N, Kurabayashi T.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 17234544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 43.