These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
820 related items for PubMed ID: 18850504
1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine at 3 Tesla. Fries P, Runge VM, Kirchin MA, Watkins DM, Buecker A, Schneider G. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2008 Sep; 12(3):238-52. PubMed ID: 18850504 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Lee C, Dean BL. Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1991 Mar; 3(2):41-73. PubMed ID: 2025433 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience. Scarabino T, Giannatempo GM, Popolizio T, Tosetti M, d'Alesio V, Esposito F, Di Salle F, Di Costanzo A, Bertolino A, Maggialetti A, Salvolini U. Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) score assessed with an isotropic three-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence at 3.0 Tesla. Welsch GH, Zak L, Mamisch TC, Resinger C, Marlovits S, Trattnig S. Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):603-12. PubMed ID: 19692843 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Berns DH, Blaser SI, Modic MT. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 Jul; (244):78-100. PubMed ID: 2663292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The use of MR contrast agents in the evaluation of disease of the spine. Jinkins JR, Runge VM. Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1995 Jul; 7(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 7654395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. MR imaging of the spine at 3T. Shapiro MD. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 16530638 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Midfield and low-field magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Rothschild PA, Winkler ML, Grönemeyer DH, Kaufman L, D'Amour P. Top Magn Reson Imaging; 1988 Dec; 1(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 3078534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Imaging of the musculoskeletal system in vivo using ultra-high field magnetic resonance at 7 T. Krug R, Stehling C, Kelley DA, Majumdar S, Link TM. Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):613-8. PubMed ID: 19652609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3.0 T versus 1.5 T MR: imaging of the spine. Phalke VV, Gujar S, Quint DJ. Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2006 May; 16(2):241-8, ix. PubMed ID: 16731363 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges. Wieben O, Francois C, Reeder SB. Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 18077119 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spine. Rossi DR, Charney AS. Semin Neurol; 1986 Mar; 6(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 3332413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pulse sequences in lumbar spine imaging. Ruggieri PM. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1999 Aug; 7(3):425-37, vii. PubMed ID: 10494527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [MRI in degenerative and post-traumatic changes of the spine]. Judmaier W, zur Nedden D. Orthopade; 1994 Sep; 23(5):306-12. PubMed ID: 7970690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging of the spine at 3 tesla. Shapiro M. Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2012 May; 22(2):315-41, xi-xii. PubMed ID: 22548935 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of triangular fibrocartilage complex lesions in acute wrist trauma: image quality at different field strengths. Stehling C, Bachmann R, Langer M, Nassenstein I, Heindel W, Vieth V. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009 May; 33(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 19638854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Interventional and intraoperative MRI at low field scanner--a review. Blanco RT, Ojala R, Kariniemi J, Perälä J, Niinimäki J, Tervonen O. Eur J Radiol; 2005 Nov; 56(2):130-42. PubMed ID: 15908156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A review of MR physics: 3T versus 1.5T. Soher BJ, Dale BM, Merkle EM. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2007 Aug; 15(3):277-90, v. PubMed ID: 17893049 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope. Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Heinrichs U, Kozerke S, Utting JF, Kob M, Butenweg C, Boesiger P, Niendorf T. Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Technical aspects: development, manufacture and installation of a cryo-cooled HTS coil system for high-resolution in-vivo imaging of the mouse at 1.5 T. Ginefri JC, Poirier-Quinot M, Girard O, Darrasse L. Methods; 2007 Sep; 43(1):54-67. PubMed ID: 17720564 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]