These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
344 related items for PubMed ID: 18852102
1. The genetic code can cause systematic bias in simple phylogenetic models. Whelan S. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec 27; 363(1512):4003-11. PubMed ID: 18852102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Spatial and temporal heterogeneity in nucleotide sequence evolution. Whelan S. Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Aug 27; 25(8):1683-94. PubMed ID: 18502771 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Artifactual phylogenies caused by correlated distribution of substitution rates among sites and lineages: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Ruano-Rubio V, Fares MA. Syst Biol; 2007 Feb 27; 56(1):68-82. PubMed ID: 17366138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximum likelihood estimates of species trees: how accuracy of phylogenetic inference depends upon the divergence history and sampling design. McCormack JE, Huang H, Knowles LL. Syst Biol; 2009 Oct 27; 58(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 20525604 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Codon substitution models based on residue similarity and their applications. Liu X, Liu H, Guo W, Yu K. Gene; 2012 Nov 01; 509(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 22902303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution. Kosiol C, Holmes I, Goldman N. Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jul 01; 24(7):1464-79. PubMed ID: 17400572 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of genetic convergence on phylogenetic inference. Christin PA, Besnard G, Edwards EJ, Salamin N. Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2012 Mar 01; 62(3):921-7. PubMed ID: 22197805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Likelihood-based clustering (LiBaC) for codon models, a method for grouping sites according to similarities in the underlying process of evolution. Bao L, Gu H, Dunn KA, Bielawski JP. Mol Biol Evol; 2008 Sep 01; 25(9):1995-2007. PubMed ID: 18586695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A Bayesian model comparison approach to inferring positive selection. Scheffler K, Seoighe C. Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Dec 01; 22(12):2531-40. PubMed ID: 16120799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An amino acid substitution-selection model adjusts residue fitness to improve phylogenetic estimation. Wang HC, Susko E, Roger AJ. Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr 01; 31(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 24441033 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of phylogenetic uncertainty on the detection of positive Darwinian selection. Pie MR. Mol Biol Evol; 2006 Dec 01; 23(12):2274-8. PubMed ID: 16971694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets. García-Pereira MJ, Caballero A, Quesada H. Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May 01; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates. Mayrose I, Doron-Faigenboim A, Bacharach E, Pupko T. Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul 01; 23(13):i319-27. PubMed ID: 17646313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]