These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 1885274

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol): advantages over standard ionic agents.
    Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Bhargava V, Stein JB, Lew W, Slutsky RA, Shabetai R, Higgins CB.
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Apr; 51(7):1218-22. PubMed ID: 6837464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB, Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Shaw D.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Apr; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparative effects of ionic and nonionic contrast materials on indexes of isovolumic contraction and relaxation in humans.
    Mancini GB, Atwood JE, Bhargava V, Slutsky RA, Grover M, Higgins CB.
    Am J Cardiol; 1984 Jan 01; 53(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 6691265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of high (sodium meglumine diatrizoate, Renografin-76) and low osmolar (sodium meglumine ioxaglate, Hexabrix) radiographic contrast media on diastolic function during left ventriculography in patients.
    Aguirre FV, Pedersen W, Castello R, Deligonul U, Gudipati C, Serota H, Labovitz AJ, Kern MJ.
    Am Heart J; 1991 Mar 01; 121(3 Pt 1):848-57. PubMed ID: 2000752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the hemodynamic effects of intravenous administration of ionic and nonionic contrast materials. Implications for deriving physiologic measurements from computed tomography and digital cardiovascular imaging.
    Higgins CB, Gerber KH, Mattrey RF, Slutsky RA.
    Radiology; 1982 Mar 01; 142(3):681-6. PubMed ID: 7063684
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
    Karle A, Fries J, Laulund S, Andrew E.
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986 Mar 01; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW, Wisneski JA, Chiu D, Akin JR, Hu C.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb 01; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of meglumine sodium diatrizoate, iopamidol, and iohexol for coronary angiography and ventriculography.
    Murdock CJ, Davis MJ, Ireland MA, Gibbons FA, Cope GD.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1990 Mar 01; 19(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 2180577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.