These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
159 related items for PubMed ID: 18853029
1. Validity, reliability and applicability of Portuguese versions of sedation-agitation scales among critically ill patients. Nassar Junior AP, Pires Neto RC, de Figueiredo WB, Park M. Sao Paulo Med J; 2008 Jul; 126(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 18853029 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ramsay Sedation Scale and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale: A Cross-sectional Study. Rasheed AM, Amirah MF, Abdallah M, P J P, Issa M, Alharthy A. Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2019 Jul; 38(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 30702478 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, Thomason JW, Wheeler AP, Gordon S, Francis J, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Sessler CN, Dittus RS, Bernard GR. JAMA; 2003 Jun 11; 289(22):2983-91. PubMed ID: 12799407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reliability of an intuitive conscious sedation scoring tool: the nursing instrument for the communication of sedation. Mirski MA, LeDroux SN, Lewin JJ, Thompson CB, Mirski KT, Griswold M. Crit Care Med; 2010 Aug 11; 38(8):1674-84. PubMed ID: 20581667 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients. Riker RR, Picard JT, Fraser GL. Crit Care Med; 1999 Jul 11; 27(7):1325-9. PubMed ID: 10446827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: translation and reliability testing in a Swedish intensive care unit. Almgren M, Lundmark M, Samuelson K. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2010 Jul 11; 54(6):729-35. PubMed ID: 20002362 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Between the fixed and the changing": examining and comparing reliability and validity of 3 sedation-agitation measuring scales. Rassin M, Sruyah R, Kahalon A, Naveh R, Nicar I, Silner D. Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 2007 Jul 11; 26(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 17312412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The correlation among the Ramsay sedation scale, Richmond agitation sedation scale and Riker sedation agitation scale during midazolam-remifentanil sedation]. Namigar T, Serap K, Esra AT, Özgül O, Can ÖA, Aysel A, Achmet A. Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2017 Jul 11; 67(4):347-354. PubMed ID: 28412050 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Bispectral Index monitoring correlates with sedation scales in brain-injured patients. Deogaonkar A, Gupta R, DeGeorgia M, Sabharwal V, Gopakumaran B, Schubert A, Provencio JJ. Crit Care Med; 2004 Dec 11; 32(12):2403-6. PubMed ID: 15599143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Entropy correlates with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients. Sharma A, Singh PM, Trikha A, Rewari V, Chandralekha. J Clin Monit Comput; 2014 Apr 11; 28(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 24122077 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriateness and reliability testing of the modified Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in Spanish patients with advanced cancer. Benítez-Rosario MA, Castillo-Padrós M, Garrido-Bernet B, González-Guillermo T, Martínez-Castillo LP, González A, Members of the Asocación Canaria de Cuidados Paliativos (CANPAL) Research Network. J Pain Symptom Manage; 2013 Jun 11; 45(6):1112-9. PubMed ID: 23726218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating pain, sedation, and delirium in the neurologically critically ill-feasibility and reliability of standardized tools: a multi-institutional study. Yu A, Teitelbaum J, Scott J, Gesin G, Russell B, Huynh T, Skrobik Y. Crit Care Med; 2013 Aug 11; 41(8):2002-7. PubMed ID: 23863231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Palliative sedation: reliability and validity of sedation scales. Arevalo JJ, Brinkkemper T, van der Heide A, Rietjens JA, Ribbe M, Deliens L, Loer SA, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS, AMROSE Site Study Group. J Pain Symptom Manage; 2012 Nov 11; 44(5):704-14. PubMed ID: 22819440 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity, reliability and feasibility of four instruments for assessing the consciousness of stroke patients in a neurological intensive care unit compared. Yan X, Xiao L, Liao M, Huang J, He Z, Yan T. BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr 08; 22(1):102. PubMed ID: 35395722 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Confirming the reliability of the sedation-agitation scale administered by ICU nurses without experience in its use. Brandl KM, Langley KA, Riker RR, Dork LA, Quails CR, Levy H. Pharmacotherapy; 2001 Apr 08; 21(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 11310516 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of a Modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. Vasilevskis EE, Pandharipande PP, Graves AJ, Shintani A, Tsuruta R, Ely EW, Girard TD. Crit Care Med; 2016 Jan 08; 44(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 26457749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sedation and analgesia assessment tools in ICU patients]. Thuong M. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2008 Jan 08; 27(7-8):581-95. PubMed ID: 18602791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]