These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 1891258

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of a digital workstation for interpreting neonatal examinations. A receiver operating characteristic study.
    Franken EA, Berbaum KS, Marley SM, Smith WL, Sato Y, Kao SC, Milam SG.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Sep; 27(9):732-7. PubMed ID: 1399457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of a PACS workstation for assessment of body CT studies.
    Berbaum KS, Franken EA, Honda H, McGuire C, Weis RR, Barloon T.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990 Sep; 14(5):853-8. PubMed ID: 2398178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Adult fingers visualized on neonatal intensive care unit chest radiographs: what you don't see.
    Russell J, Burbridge BE, Duncan MD, Tynan J.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2013 Aug; 64(3):236-9. PubMed ID: 22884228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of 10 : 1 compression and soft copy interpretation on the chest radiographs of premature neonates with reference to their possible application in teleradiology.
    Parisi SB, Mogel GT, Dominguez R, Dao H, Cramer TJ.
    Eur Radiol; 1998 Aug; 8(1):141-3. PubMed ID: 9442147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Image preprocessing for a picture archiving and communication system.
    McNitt-Gray MF, Pietka E, Huang HK.
    Invest Radiol; 1992 Jul; 27(7):529-35. PubMed ID: 1644553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A picture archival and communication system shortens delays in obtaining radiographic information in a medical intensive care unit.
    Redfern RO, Kundel HL, Polansky M, Langlotz CP, Horii SC, Lanken PN.
    Crit Care Med; 2000 Apr; 28(4):1006-13. PubMed ID: 10809274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Digital chest radiography.
    MacMahon H, Doi K.
    Clin Chest Med; 1991 Mar; 12(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 2009743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of full-field digital mammography workstation and conventional picture archiving and communication system in image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Kang BJ, Kim SH, Choi BG.
    Clin Imaging; 2011 Mar; 35(5):336-40. PubMed ID: 21872121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future.
    Arenson RL, Andriole KP, Avrin DE, Gould RG.
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 Nov; 13(4):145-56. PubMed ID: 11110253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Development of computerized method for automated classification of the body parts in digital radiographs].
    Kawashita I, Ishida T, Arimura H, Katsuragawa S, Komi M, Awai K, Hori S, Doi K.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Mar; 59(3):396-7. PubMed ID: 12740561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Interpretation of digital breast tomosynthesis: preliminary study on comparison with picture archiving and communication system (PACS) and dedicated workstation.
    Kim YS, Chang JM, Yi A, Shin SU, Lee ME, Kim WH, Cho N, Moon WK.
    Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1077):20170182. PubMed ID: 28707529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison between digital images viewed on a picture archiving and communication system diagnostic workstation and on a PC-based remote viewing system by emergency physicians.
    Parasyn A, Hanson RM, Peat JK, De Silva M.
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Feb; 11(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 9502325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Quality assurance and quality control of an intensive care unit picture archiving and communication system.
    Tucker DM, McEachern M.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Nov; 8(4):162-7. PubMed ID: 8573625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film.
    Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Radiology report times: impact of picture archiving and communication systems.
    Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Watkins J, Roddie M, Keen J, Muris N, Buxton MJ.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1153-9. PubMed ID: 9574575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Economic and organizational evaluation of an imaging network (PACS)].
    Charvet-Protat S, Thoral F.
    J Radiol; 1998 Dec; 79(12):1453-9. PubMed ID: 9921447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Experience of a small PACS in Tottori University Hospital.
    Mizukawa K, Sawada S, Hirata Y, Kadohara S, Kotani K, Ohta Y.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1992 May; 37(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 1395530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Digital radiography and film scanners: automating the transition to filmless radiology.
    Dzingle D, May GA, Garland HT.
    J Digit Imaging; 2001 Jun; 14(2 Suppl 1):128-30. PubMed ID: 11442072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of a PACS workstation with laser hard copies for detecting scaphoid fractures in the emergency department.
    Khaliq W, Blakeley CJ, Maheshwaran S, Hashemi K, Redman P.
    J Digit Imaging; 2010 Feb; 23(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 18989609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.