These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. A review of NAPL source zone remediation efficiency and the mass flux approach. Soga K, Page JW, Illangasekare TH. J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jul 05; 110(1-3):13-27. PubMed ID: 15177723 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Evaluation of simplified mass transfer models to simulate the impacts of source zone architecture on nonaqueous phase liquid dissolution in heterogeneous porous media. Zhang C, Yoon H, Werth CJ, Valocchi AJ, Basu NB, Jawitz JW. J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov 14; 102(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 18579257 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Relative contribution of DNAPL dissolution and matrix diffusion to the long-term persistence of chlorinated solvent source zones. Seyedabbasi MA, Newell CJ, Adamson DT, Sale TC. J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jun 14; 134-135():69-81. PubMed ID: 22591740 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of mass depletion-mass flux reduction relationships during pumping to determine source zone mass of a reactive brominated-solvent DNAPL. Johnston CD, Davis GB, Bastow TP, Annable MD, Trefry MG, Furness A, Geste Y, Woodbury RJ, Rao PS, Rhodes S. J Contam Hydrol; 2013 Jan 14; 144(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 23247401 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing impacts of partial mass depletion in DNAPL source zones: II. Coupling source strength functions to plume evolution. Falta RW, Basu N, Rao PS. J Contam Hydrol; 2005 Sep 14; 79(1-2):45-66. PubMed ID: 16061307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of reduced contaminant loading on downgradient water quality in an idealized two-layer granular porous media. Sale TC, Zimbron JA, Dandy DS. J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov 14; 102(1-2):72-85. PubMed ID: 18930336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Removal of DNAPL contamination from the saturated zone by the combined effect of vertical upward flushing and density reduction. Hofstee C, Gutiérrez Ziegler C, Trötschler O, Braun J. J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Dec 14; 67(1-4):61-78. PubMed ID: 14607470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Dissolved plume attenuation with DNAPL source remediation, aqueous decay and volatilization--analytical solution, model calibration and prediction uncertainty. Parker JC, Park E, Tang G. J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Nov 14; 102(1-2):61-71. PubMed ID: 18502537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A controlled field experiment on groundwater contamination by a multicomponent DNAPL: dissolved-plume retardation. Rivett MO, Allen-King RM. J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Oct 14; 66(1-2):117-46. PubMed ID: 14516944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cost optimization of DNAPL source and plume remediation under uncertainty using a semi-analytic model. Cardiff M, Liu X, Kitanidis PK, Parker J, Kim U. J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Apr 01; 113(1-4):25-43. PubMed ID: 20185203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of single-fracture aperture statistics on entrapment, dissolution and source depletion behavior of dense non-aqueous phase liquids. Yang Z, Niemi A, Fagerlund F, Illangasekare T. J Contam Hydrol; 2012 May 15; 133():1-16. PubMed ID: 22481125 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Solvent release into a sandy aquifer. 2. Estimation of DNAPL mass based on a multiple-component dissolution model. Broholm K, Feenstra S, Cherry JA. Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Jan 01; 39(1):317-24. PubMed ID: 15667112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]