These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

615 related items for PubMed ID: 18931643

  • 21. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Auditory brainstem implants for neurofibromatosis type 2.
    Colletti L, Shannon R, Colletti V.
    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Oct 12; 20(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 22886036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Clinical application of the multichannel auditory brainstem implant].
    Wu H, Sterkers O, Rey A, Bouccara D.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Apr 12; 35(2):123-5. PubMed ID: 12768669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Electrode Selection and Speech Understanding in Patients With Auditory Brainstem Implants.
    McKay CM, Azadpour M, Jayewardene-Aston D, O'Driscoll M, El-Deredy W.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Apr 12; 36(4):454-63. PubMed ID: 25668392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug 12; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Auditory brainstem implants in neurofibromatosis Type 2: is open speech perception feasible?
    Matthies C, Brill S, Varallyay C, Solymosi L, Gelbrich G, Roosen K, Ernestus RI, Helms J, Hagen R, Mlynski R, Shehata-Dieler W, Müller J.
    J Neurosurg; 2014 Feb 12; 120(2):546-58. PubMed ID: 24329026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant.
    Boyd PJ.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec 12; 27(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 17086073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
    Huang TC, Reitzen SD, Marrinan MS, Waltzman SB, Roland JT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb 12; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comprehensive evaluation of a child with an auditory brainstem implant.
    Eisenberg LS, Johnson KC, Martinez AS, DesJardin JL, Stika CJ, Dzubak D, Mahalak ML, Rector EP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb 12; 29(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 18025999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Cochlear implantation in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 and bilateral vestibular schwannoma.
    Lustig LR, Yeagle J, Driscoll CL, Blevins N, Francis H, Niparko JK.
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Jun 12; 27(4):512-8. PubMed ID: 16791043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Nonverbal cognitive abilities and auditory performance in children fitted with auditory brainstem implants: preliminary report.
    Colletti L, Zoccante L.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Aug 12; 118(8):1443-8. PubMed ID: 18496153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr 12; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R, De Filippi R, Genovese E, Arslan E.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Apr 12; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Auditory prostheses research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in man.
    Eddington DK, Dobelle WH, Brackmann DE, Mladejovsky MG, Parkin JL.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1978 Apr 12; 87(6 Pt 2):1-39. PubMed ID: 736424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Outcomes in nontumor adults fitted with the auditory brainstem implant: 10 years' experience.
    Colletti V, Shannon R, Carner M, Veronese S, Colletti L.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Aug 12; 30(5):614-8. PubMed ID: 19546832
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Auditory outcomes in tumor vs. nontumor patients fitted with auditory brainstem implants.
    Colletti V.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Aug 12; 64():167-185. PubMed ID: 16891842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The intensity-pitch relation revisited: monopolar versus bipolar cochlear stimulation.
    Arnoldner C, Riss D, Kaider A, Mair A, Wagenblast J, Baumgartner WD, Gstöttner W, Hamzavi JS.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep 12; 118(9):1630-6. PubMed ID: 18545213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun 12; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The effect of frequency allocation on phoneme recognition with the nucleus 22 cochlear implant.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Slattery WH.
    Am J Otol; 1999 Nov 12; 20(6):729-34. PubMed ID: 10565716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. New outcomes with auditory brainstem implants in NF2 patients.
    Behr R, Colletti V, Matthies C, Morita A, Nakatomi H, Dominique L, Darrouzet V, Brill S, Shehata-Dieler W, Lorens A, Skarzynski H.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec 12; 35(10):1844-51. PubMed ID: 25325841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 31.