These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

338 related items for PubMed ID: 18936958

  • 1. Estimating body fat in NCAA Division I female athletes: a five-compartment model validation of laboratory methods.
    Moon JR, Eckerson JM, Tobkin SE, Smith AE, Lockwood CM, Walter AA, Cramer JT, Beck TW, Stout JR.
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2009 Jan; 105(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 18936958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Impact of food and fluid intake on technical and biological measurement error in body composition assessment methods in athletes.
    Kerr A, Slater GJ, Byrne N.
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Feb; 117(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 28382898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Percentage fat in overweight and obese children: comparison of DXA and air displacement plethysmography.
    Radley D, Gately PJ, Cooke CB, Carroll S, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG.
    Obes Res; 2005 Jan; 13(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 15761165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validity of the 4-compartment model using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived body volume in overweight individuals.
    Blue MNM, Hirsch KR, Trexler ET, Smith-Ryan AE.
    Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2018 Jul; 43(7):742-746. PubMed ID: 29474800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prediction of percent body fat in adult males using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry, skinfolds, and hydrostatic weighing.
    Clark RR, Kuta JM, Sullivan JC.
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1993 Apr; 25(4):528-35. PubMed ID: 8479309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Accuracy of Siri and Brozek equations in the percent body fat estimation in older adults.
    Guerra RS, Amaral TF, Marques E, Mota J, Restivo MT.
    J Nutr Health Aging; 2010 Nov; 14(9):744-8. PubMed ID: 21085903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese children.
    Gately PJ, Radley D, Cooke CB, Carroll S, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG, Coward WA, Wright A.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2003 Nov; 95(5):2039-46. PubMed ID: 14555670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Validity of Foot-To-Foot Bioelectrical Impedance for Estimating Body Composition in NCAA Division I Male Athletes: A 3-Compartment Model Comparison.
    Nickerson BS, Snarr RL, Ryan GA.
    J Strength Cond Res; 2019 Dec; 33(12):3361-3366. PubMed ID: 30789577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.