These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

339 related items for PubMed ID: 18949518

  • 1. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
    Ilgüy M, Dinçer S, Ilgüy D, Bayirli G.
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA.
    Caries Res; 2000 Jun; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A, Frydenberg M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A, Svanaes DB, van der Stelt PF, Gröndahl HG, Wenzel A, van Ginkel FC, Kullendorff B, Hintze H, Larheim TA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
    Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A, Svanaes DB, Risnes S, Larheim TA, Gröndahl HG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A, van der Stelt PF, van Ginkel FC.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. In vivo study of approximal caries depth on storage phosphor plate images compared with dental x-ray film.
    Versteeg KH, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9269024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of monitor display on detection of approximal caries lesions in digital radiographs.
    Isidor S, Faaborg-Andersen M, Hintze H, Kirkevang LL, Frydenberg M, Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Dec; 38(8):537-41. PubMed ID: 20026711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of tube potential and image receptor on the detection of natural proximal caries in primary teeth.
    Sogur E, Baksı BG, Orhan K, Paksoy SC, Dogan S, Erdal YS, Mert A.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Dec; 15(6):901-7. PubMed ID: 20838834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Scheetz JP, Brown WP, Lewis J, Benefiel M, Kuroyanagi K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of microscopy and radiography as gold standards in radiographic caries diagnosis.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 10740474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conventional, digital and contrast-enhanced bitewing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions.
    Haak R, Wicht MJ, Noack MJ.
    Caries Res; 2001 May; 35(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 11385199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Performance of film, desktop monitor and laptop displays in caries detection.
    Ludlow JB, Abreu M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 10202475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.