These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

441 related items for PubMed ID: 18976144

  • 1. Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Szydełko T, Kopeć R, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W, Kołodziej A, Zdrojowy R, Lorenz J.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Feb; 19(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 18976144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC, Kaye JD, Guttman MJ, Lee BR, Smith AD.
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP, Grubb RL, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Desai MM, Desai MR, Gill IS.
    Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Is antegrade endopyelotomy really less invasive than open pyeloplasty?
    Dobry E, Usai P, Studer UE, Danuser H.
    Urol Int; 2007 Jul; 79(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17851286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered Y-V laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with primary hydronephrosis.
    Szydełko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W, Kołodziej A, Zdrojowy R, Dembowski J, Niezgoda T.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2010 Feb; 20(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20059324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
    Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, Sugiono M, Schulze M, Teber D, Frede T.
    J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ, Jayanthi VR, Lowe GJ.
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Influence of stent size on the success of antegrade endopyelotomy for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: results of 2 consecutive series.
    Danuser H, Hochreiter WW, Ackermann DK, Studer UE.
    J Urol; 2001 Sep; 166(3):902-9. PubMed ID: 11490243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY, Cho JS, Srinivasan A, Seideman CA, Huckabay CP, Andonian S, Lee BR, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR.
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): solving the technical difficulties.
    Bachmann A, Ruszat R, Forster T, Eberli D, Zimmermann M, Müller A, Gasser TC, Sulser T, Wyler S.
    Eur Urol; 2006 Feb; 49(2):264-72. PubMed ID: 16439056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modified laparoscopic Y-V pyeloplasty: experience of a single center.
    Szydełko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznański W.
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2009 Oct; 19(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 19715486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Retrograde ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy in a selected population of patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Stilling NM, Jung H, Nørby B, Osther SS, Osther PJ.
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009 Oct; 43(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 18949631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hydronephrosis: Comparison of extrinsic vessel versus intrinsic ureteropelvic junction obstruction groups and a plea against the vascular hitch procedure.
    Menon P, Rao KL, Sodhi KS, Bhattacharya A, Saxena AK, Mittal BR.
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):80.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25794866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Hussain A, Whelan P, Piercey K, Kapoor A.
    Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Endopyelotomy review.
    Bernardo N, Smith AD.
    Arch Esp Urol; 1999 Jun; 52(5):541-8. PubMed ID: 10427896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Long-term outcome of secondary endopyelotomy after failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Park J, Kim WS, Hong B, Park T, Park HK.
    Int J Urol; 2008 Jun; 15(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 18422578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K, Minervini A, Timoney AG, Keeley FX.
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
    Kojima Y, Sasaki S, Mizuno K, Tozawa K, Hayashi Y, Kohri K.
    Int J Urol; 2009 May; 16(5):472-6. PubMed ID: 19383038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases).
    Chuanyu S, Guowei X, Ke X, Qiang D, Yuanfang Z.
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19660798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.