These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

446 related items for PubMed ID: 18977848

  • 1. Application of PUF foam inserts for respirable dust measurements in the brick-manufacturing industry.
    De Vocht F, Hirst A, Gardner A.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2009 Jan; 53(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 18977848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of portable, real-time dust monitors sampling actively, with size-selective adaptors, and passively.
    Thorpe A, Walsh PT.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Nov; 51(8):679-91. PubMed ID: 18024485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Applications of low-cost, dual-fraction dust samplers.
    Kenny L, Chung K, Dilworth M, Hammond C, Wynn Jones J, Shreeve Z, Winton J.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jan; 45(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 11137697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Laboratory and field testing of sampling methods for inhalable and respirable dust.
    Linnainmaa M, Laitinen J, Leskinen A, Sippula O, Kalliokoski P.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Jan; 5(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 18041642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Equivalency of a personal dust monitor to the current United States coal mine respirable dust sampler.
    Page SJ, Volkwein JC, Vinson RP, Joy GJ, Mischler SE, Tuchman DP, McWilliams LJ.
    J Environ Monit; 2008 Jan; 10(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18175022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of personal direct-reading dust monitors for the measurement of airborne inhalable dust.
    Thorpe A.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Jan; 51(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 16799158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O, Grinshpun SA, Fauvel S, Basso G.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cotton dust and endotoxin levels in three Shanghai textile factories: a comparison of samplers.
    Astrakianakis G, Seixas N, Camp J, Smith TJ, Bartlett K, Checkoway H.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Aug; 3(8):418-27. PubMed ID: 16862712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A comparison of X-ray fluorescence and wet chemical analysis for lead on air filters from different personal samplers used in a secondary lead smelter/solder manufacturer.
    Harper M, Pacolay B.
    J Environ Monit; 2006 Jan; 8(1):140-6. PubMed ID: 16395471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Environmental exposure characterization of fish processing workers.
    Jeebhay MF, Robins TG, Seixas N, Baatjies R, George DA, Rusford E, Lehrer SB, Lopata AL.
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2005 Jul; 49(5):423-37. PubMed ID: 15705596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A survey of size-fractionated dust levels in the U.S. wood processing industry.
    Kalliny MI, Brisolara JA, Glindmeyer H, Rando R.
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Aug; 5(8):501-10. PubMed ID: 18569517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 23.