These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
611 related items for PubMed ID: 18978579
1. Biomechanical differences between transfacet and lateral mass screw-rod constructs for multilevel posterior cervical spine stabilization. Miyanji F, Mahar A, Oka R, Newton P. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov 01; 33(23):E865-9. PubMed ID: 18978579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of a novel percutaneous transfacet device and a traditional posterior system for single level fusion. Mahar A, Kim C, Oka R, Odell T, Perry A, Mirkovic S, Garfin S. J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Dec 01; 19(8):591-4. PubMed ID: 17146303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques. Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR. Spine J; 2007 Dec 01; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine. Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Fifield MS, LeHuec JC, Dickman CA. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr 01; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics. Dmitriev AE, Kuklo TR, Lehman RA, Rosner MK. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar 15; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of posterior screw fixation in cadaveric cervical spines. Papagelopoulos PJ, Currier BL, Neale PG, Hokari Y, Berglund LJ, Larson DR, Fisher DR, An KN. Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Jun 15; (411):13-24. PubMed ID: 12782855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Atlantoaxial fusion: a biomechanical analysis of two C1-C2 fusion techniques. Claybrooks R, Kayanja M, Milks R, Benzel E. Spine J; 2007 Jun 15; 7(6):682-8. PubMed ID: 17434809 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lateral mass screw-rod fixation of the cervical spine: a prospective clinical series with 1-year follow-up. Deen HG, Birch BD, Wharen RE, Reimer R. Spine J; 2003 Jun 15; 3(6):489-95. PubMed ID: 14609694 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: effects of short-term and long-term repetitive cycling. Ferrara LA, Secor JL, Jin BH, Wakefield A, Inceoglu S, Benzel EC. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun 15; 28(12):1226-34. PubMed ID: 12811265 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions. Agarwala A, Bucklen B, Muzumdar A, Moldavsky M, Khalil S. Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2012 Jan 15; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21849224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]