These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

498 related items for PubMed ID: 18990681

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Numerical simulation of the urine flow in a stented ureter.
    Tong JC, Sparrow EM, Abraham JP.
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 17408323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A short biodegradable helical spiral ureteric stent provides better antireflux and drainage properties than a double-J stent.
    Lumiaho J, Heino A, Aaltomaa S, Välimaa T, Talja M.
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 21222571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Effects of ureteral stents on rabbit upper urinary tract urodynamics].
    Qi DF, Wu KJ, Li X, Shan ZC, Xia MY, Guo B, Chen WZ, Zeng GH.
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2004 Nov; 24(11):1260-2. PubMed ID: 15567773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of ureteric stents on urine flow: reflux.
    Cummings LJ, Waters SL, Wattis JA, Graham SJ.
    J Math Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(1):56-82. PubMed ID: 15235819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pressure transmission through ureteric stents: a novel in vivo human study.
    Sameh WM, Eid AA.
    Urology; 2012 Apr; 79(4):766-70. PubMed ID: 22245299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Urometry in vesico-ureteral reflux. Pressure recordings in refluxing and non-refluxing urinary tracts of children.
    Edelman E.
    Acta Chir Scand Suppl; 1973 Apr; 435():1-60. PubMed ID: 4521063
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Ureteric stents: investigating flow and encrustation.
    Waters SL, Heaton K, Siggers JH, Bayston R, Bishop M, Cummings LJ, Grant DM, Oliver JM, Wattis JA.
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2008 May; 222(4):551-61. PubMed ID: 18595364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A mathematical simulation of the ureter: effects of the model parameters on ureteral pressure/flow relations.
    Vahidi B, Fatouraee N, Imanparast A, Moghadam AN.
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Mar; 133(3):031004. PubMed ID: 21303180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Numerical analysis of the urine flow in a stented ureter with no peristalsis.
    Kim HH, Choi YH, Lee SB, Baba Y, Kim KW, Suh SH.
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015 Mar; 26 Suppl 1():S215-23. PubMed ID: 26405994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Simulated vesicoureteral reflux: comparison between the normal and hydrostatically bypassed ureterovesical junction as a function of urine flow rate and bladder pressure.
    Constantinou CE, Tsuchida S, Kavaney PB, Hayman WP, Govan DE.
    Urol Int; 1974 Mar; 29(4):265-79. PubMed ID: 4826183
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The 'buoy' stent: evaluation of a prototype indwelling ureteric stent in a porcine model.
    Krebs A, Deane LA, Borin JF, Edwards RA, Sala LG, Khan F, Abdelshehid C, McDougall EM, Clayman RV.
    BJU Int; 2009 Jul; 104(1):88-92. PubMed ID: 19154469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A biomechanical simulation of ureteral flow during peristalsis using intraluminal morphometric data.
    Vahidi B, Fatouraee N.
    J Theor Biol; 2012 Apr 07; 298():42-50. PubMed ID: 22214750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.