These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
337 related items for PubMed ID: 19000734
1. Contingent capture of visual-spatial attention depends on capacity-limited central mechanisms: evidence from human electrophysiology and the psychological refractory period. Brisson B, Leblanc E, Jolicoeur P. Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19000734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term consolidation of visual patterns interferes with visuo-spatial attention: converging evidence from human electrophysiology. Robitaille N, Jolicoeur P, Dell'Acqua R, Sessa P. Brain Res; 2007 Dec 14; 1185():158-69. PubMed ID: 17936730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention. Al-Aidroos N, Harrison S, Pratt J. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan 14; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method. Li L, Yao D, Yin G. Brain Res; 2009 Jul 28; 1282():84-94. PubMed ID: 19501069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. N2pc and attentional capture by colour and orientation-singletons in pure and mixed visual search tasks. Rodríguez Holguín S, Doallo S, Vizoso C, Cadaveira F. Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep 28; 73(3):279-86. PubMed ID: 19409424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Leblanc E, Prime DJ, Jolicoeur P. J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr 28; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture. Ghorashi SM, Zuvic SM, Visser TA, Di Lollo V. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb 28; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology. Jolicoeur P, Sessa P, Dell'Acqua R, Robitaille N. Psychol Res; 2006 Nov 28; 70(6):414-24. PubMed ID: 16184394 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On the locus of dual-task interference: Is there a bottleneck at the stimulus classification stage? Johnston JC, McCann RS. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr 28; 59(4):694-719. PubMed ID: 16707358 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm. SanMiguel I, Corral MJ, Escera C. J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul 28; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials. Lien MC, Ruthruff E, Goodin Z, Remington RW. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun 28; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory. Dell'Acqua R, Sessa P, Toffanin P, Luria R, Jolicoeur P. Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jan 28; 48(2):419-28. PubMed ID: 19804791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is lexical access autonomous? Evidence from combining overlapping tasks with recording event-related brain potentials. Rabovsky M, Alvarez CJ, Hohlfeld A, Sommer W. Brain Res; 2008 Jul 30; 1222():156-65. PubMed ID: 18585684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrophysiological correlates of attention-spreading in visual grouping. Kasai T, Kondo M. Neuroreport; 2007 Jan 08; 18(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 17259868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]