These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 19000917

  • 1. Contrast adaptation induced by defocus - a possible error signal for emmetropization?
    Ohlendorf A, Schaeffel F.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):249-56. PubMed ID: 19000917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Changes in contrast sensitivity induced by defocus and their possible relations to emmetropization in the chicken.
    Diether S, Gekeler F, Schaeffel F.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Nov; 42(12):3072-9. PubMed ID: 11687557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of positive and negative defocus on contrast sensitivity in myopes and non-myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H, Pardhan S, Calver RI, O'Leary DJ.
    Vision Res; 2004 Aug; 44(16):1869-78. PubMed ID: 15145681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Contrast detection in noise with positive and negative defocus in myopes.
    Radhakrishnan H, Pardhan S.
    Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2949-55. PubMed ID: 16650453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig.
    Howlett MH, McFadden SA.
    Vision Res; 2009 Jan; 49(2):219-27. PubMed ID: 18992765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Preserved gain control for luminance contrast during binocular rivalry suppression.
    Watanabe K, Paik Y, Blake R.
    Vision Res; 2004 Dec; 44(26):3065-71. PubMed ID: 15474579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Static accommodative responses following adaptation to differential levels of blur.
    Cufflin MP, Hazel CA, Mallen EA.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Jul; 27(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 17584286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Optical defocus: differential effects on size and contrast letter recognition thresholds.
    Rabin J.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 Feb; 35(2):646-8. PubMed ID: 8113015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. ZENK expression of retinal glucagon amacrine cells in chicks: the effect of defocus presented in vivo, in vitro and under anesthesia.
    Bitzer M, Schaeffel F.
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(6-7):848-59. PubMed ID: 16289273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The sensitivity of the chick eye to refractive defocus.
    Schmid KL, Wildsoet CF.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jan; 17(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 9135814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Through-focus visual performance measurements and predictions with multifocal contact lenses.
    Legras R, Benard Y, Rouger H.
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun 11; 50(12):1185-93. PubMed ID: 20371368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.