These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


252 related items for PubMed ID: 19001706

  • 1. Benefits and drawbacks of thermal pre-hydrolysis for operational performance of wastewater treatment plants.
    Phothilangka P, Schoen MA, Wett B.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(8):1547-53. PubMed ID: 19001706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Prediction of thermal hydrolysis pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge.
    Phothilangka P, Schoen MA, Huber M, Luchetta P, Winkler T, Wett B.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(7):1467-73. PubMed ID: 18957761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Systematic comparison of mechanical and thermal sludge disintegration technologies.
    Wett B, Phothilangka P, Eladawy A.
    Waste Manag; 2010 Jun; 30(6):1057-62. PubMed ID: 20060704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Application of the IWA anaerobic digestion model (ADM1) for simulating full-scale anaerobic sewage sludge digestion.
    Shang Y, Johnson BR, Sieger R.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Jun; 52(1-2):487-92. PubMed ID: 16180468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Minimisation of excess sludge production in a WWTP by coupling thermal hydrolysis and rapid anaerobic digestion.
    Chauzy J, Graja S, Gerardin F, Crétenot D, Patria L, Fernandes P.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Jun; 52(10-11):255-63. PubMed ID: 16459799
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reduction of sludge production from WWTP using thermal pretreatment and enhanced anaerobic methanisation.
    Graja S, Chauzy J, Fernandes P, Patria L, Cretenot D.
    Water Sci Technol; 2005 Jun; 52(1-2):267-73. PubMed ID: 16180438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Using bioprocess stoichiometry to build a plant-wide mass balance based steady-state WWTP model.
    Ekama GA.
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(8):2101-20. PubMed ID: 19345392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prospects and problems of sludge pre-treatment processes.
    Müller JA.
    Water Sci Technol; 2001 May; 44(10):121-8. PubMed ID: 11794642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impacts of separate rejection water treatment on the overall plant performance.
    Wett B, Alex J.
    Water Sci Technol; 2003 May; 48(4):139-46. PubMed ID: 14531432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Can a wastewater treatment plant be a powerplant? A case study.
    Schwarzenbeck N, Pfeiffer W, Bomball E.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008 May; 57(10):1555-61. PubMed ID: 18520012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation, selection and initial performance of a large scale centralised biosolids facility at Oxley Creek Water Reclamation Plant, Brisbane.
    Barr KG, Solley DO, Starrenburg DJ, Lewis RG.
    Water Sci Technol; 2008 May; 57(10):1579-86. PubMed ID: 18520015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Progress and perspectives of sludge ozonation as a powerful pretreatment method for minimization of excess sludge production.
    Chu L, Yan S, Xing XH, Sun X, Jurcik B.
    Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(7):1811-22. PubMed ID: 19282018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.