These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 19011117

  • 41. Inform, influence, evaluate: the power of state public opinion polls.
    Turner S, O'Connor P, Rademacher E.
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2009; 28(1):273-6. PubMed ID: 19124879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Including a Novel Tobacco Product in Oregon's Indoor Clean Air Act: Lessons Learned for Clean Air Policy, 2015-2016.
    Fiala SC, Drach LL, Parkman SW, Hargand SL, Girard KE.
    Public Health Rep; 2018; 133(3):230-233. PubMed ID: 29614237
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. The New York City Smoke-Free Air Act: second-hand smoke as a worker health and safety issue.
    Chang C, Leighton J, Mostashari F, McCord C, Frieden TR.
    Am J Ind Med; 2004 Aug; 46(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 15273972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Public health as a county government priority: problems and solutions for the political arena.
    Marando VL, Melchior AC.
    Am J Prev Med; 1995 Aug; 11(6 Suppl):17-23. PubMed ID: 8776137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Finding common ground: how public health can work with organized labor to protect workers from environmental tobacco smoke. National Association for Public Health Policy.
    J Public Health Policy; 1997 Aug; 18(4):453-64. PubMed ID: 9519620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Florida tobacco control legislation.
    Kessler SR, Harris JJ.
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1996 Feb; 83(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 8850205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Making hospital grounds smoke-free: a case study of Arkansas Act 134 of 2005.
    Felix HC, Wheeler JG, Pulley L, Stewart MK, Bursac Z, Mays GP, Mackey DS.
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(2):E9-15. PubMed ID: 19202404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Preemption in public health: the dynamics of clean indoor air laws.
    Yañez E, Cox G, Cooney M, Eadie R.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2003 Feb; 31(4 Suppl):84-5. PubMed ID: 14968637
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Changes in air quality and second-hand smoke exposure in hospitality sector businesses after introduction of the English Smoke-free legislation.
    Gotz NK, van Tongeren M, Wareing H, Wallace LM, Semple S, Maccalman L.
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2008 Dec; 30(4):421-8. PubMed ID: 18653490
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Public opinion and smoke-free laws.
    Rayens MK, Hahn EJ, Langley RE, Hedgecock S, Butler KM, Greathouse-Maggio L.
    Policy Polit Nurs Pract; 2007 Nov; 8(4):262-70. PubMed ID: 18337432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Political realities of statewide smoking legislation: the passage of California's Assembly Bill 13.
    Macdonald HR, Glantz SA.
    Tob Control; 1997 Nov; 6(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 9176985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Preemption of local smoke-free air ordinances: the implications of judicial opinions for meeting national health objectives.
    O'Connor JC, MacNeil A, Chriqui JF, Tynan M, Bates H, Eidson SK.
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 36(2):403-12, 214. PubMed ID: 18547209
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Interjurisdictional collaboration: local public health officials versus county commissioners.
    Felton J, Golbeck AL.
    J Public Health Manag Pract; 2011 Nov; 17(1):E14-21. PubMed ID: 21135650
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Evaluation of community and organizational characteristics of smoke-free ordinance campaigns in 15 Wisconsin cities.
    Ahrens D, Uebelher P, Remington PL.
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2005 Jul; 2(3):A08. PubMed ID: 15963310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Smokefree outdoor areas without the smoke-police: the New Zealand local authority experience.
    Hyslop B, Thomson G.
    N Z Med J; 2009 Sep 25; 122(1303):67-79. PubMed ID: 19851421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Competing initiatives: a new tobacco industry strategy to oppose statewide clean indoor air ballot measures.
    Tung GJ, Hendlin YH, Glantz SA.
    Am J Public Health; 2009 Mar 25; 99(3):430-9. PubMed ID: 19150904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Getting an outdoor smokefree policy: the case of Kapiti Coast District Council.
    Halkett L, Thomson G.
    N Z Med J; 2010 Jan 29; 123(1308):28-40. PubMed ID: 20173803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates.
    Givel MS, Glantz SA.
    J Public Health Policy; 2000 Jan 29; 21(3):268-95. PubMed ID: 11021043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.